Ammonia interaction diagram

Fig. 2. Components of Li enthalpies of complexation with methylamines. Successive steps indicate the effect on energy of interaction between Li and the amine of inclusion of additional components of the binding energy. The diagram shows that the permanent dipoles on amines (the charge on the nitrogen of the isolated amine) favor ammonia over trimethylamine complexation, but that polarizability and inductive effects (shift of negative charge onto the nitrogen in the complex) cause a massive turnaround in favor of complexation with trimethylamine rather than ammonia. Of particular importance is the near inversion of order caused by the addition of repulsive van der Waals terms. Modified after Ref. (9).

Fig. 1. Simplified diagram of the phenylpropanoid and flavonoid biosynthetic pathways. Enzymes that catalyze the reactions are placed on the left-hand side, and transcription factors on the right-hand side of the arrows. Both transcription factors for which their control over the enzymatic steps has been genetically proven, as well as transcription factors that have been shown to interact with promoters of the structural genes, are shown. PAL Phenylalanine ammonia lyase C4H cinnamate 4-hydroxylase 4CL 4-coumaroyl-coenzyme A ligase CHS chalcone synthase CHI chalcone-flavanone isomerase F3H flavanone 3(3-hydroxylase DFR dihydroflavonol 4-reductase AS anthocyanin synthase UFGT UDP glucose-flavonol glucosyl transferase RT anthocyanin rhamnosyl transferase...

Figure 6.3. Titration of H30 and Cu aq with ammonia (a) and with tetramine (trien) (b). Equilibrium diagrams for the distribution of NH3-NH4 (c) of the amino coppeifll) complexes (d) and of Cu ", Cu-trien (e). The similarity of titrating with a base and titrating a metal ion with a base (Lewis acid-base interaction) is obvious. Both neutralization reactions are used analytically for the determination of acids and metal ions. A pH or pMe indicator electrode (glass electrode for and copper electrode for Cu " ) can be used for the end point indication.

The reaction energy diagram (Fig. 4.36) illustrates competition between dissociative adsorption of the nitrogen molecule and desorption of ammonia. This confirms the conceptual basis of the Sabatier effect (3.7) that predicts that the rate is maximum at optimum interaction with the catalyst surface the interaction energy where the rate of dissociative adsorption or another surface reaction and desorption rate are in balance. 

Fig. 19 Isothermal slice through the phase diagram of NH3 -h C16H34 2AT = 542.6 K for the case where the physical value = 1.482 D was used for ammonia, and for an even simpler model where the dipole moment of this molecule was completely ignored (denote as MC LJ). Triangles denote MC estimates for the critical point in the plane of variables pressure p and molar concentration x of NH3 asterisks and circles are selected MC data for the miscibility gap of both models. Curves are predictions derived from TPTl-MSA, for the same choice of interaction parameters as in MC. Inset shows the critical molar concentration of NH3 for both models versus temperature. From Mognetti et al. [55]...

The first factor to consider is the bp of the gas A this indicates the position of the R-line in the whole panorama of the spectrum and refers to the tendency of A to condense at the operational temperature t°C at pressure Pa. On this factor alone, we may expect the Nnhs values to be decidedly less than the corresponding values for the three methylamines. The intermolecular structure of the liquid S will be a second, but constant, factor for the same S at the same t°C, but the mode of interaction of ammonia or the individual amines will not be strictly parallel. A scrutiny of the diagrams gives a useful appreciation of the degree to which these differences may be discerned. 

---