Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Adsorbent model

Figure 6.15. Schematic of an adsorbate, modeled as a dipole, in the presence of the metal/gas effective double layer. Figure 6.15. Schematic of an adsorbate, modeled as a dipole, in the presence of the metal/gas effective double layer.
Cerius2 (MSI Inc.) was used throughout the simulations. Adsorption equilibria was carried out by GCMC method for same systems of experiments. Adsorbent model was pure silicious Y type that was same type as experimental adsorbent. Simulation forcefield parameters were new forcefield parameter obtained by Mellot et al l Solvent charges were determined with Charge-Equilibration method, respectively. [Pg.515]

In the simulation using the force field parameter of London, although morlarity was increasing by MSC84 model, the result that the amount adsorbed decreases sharply was shown. In the two components system, not only the interaction of an adsorbent model and adsorbate model but the interaction of adsorbate model is added, calculation becomes more complicated, it is thought that such a result arose. [Pg.604]

Fig. 1. Schematic of model generation. Quench molecular dynamics simulations of a binary mixture (top) produce a series of networked stmcturcs which are processed into adsorbent models (bottom, shown in cutaway view.) The longer the quench is allowed to proceed, the greater the resulting pore size. The porosity of the model materials is detennined by the mole fraction of the quenched mixture. Fig. 1. Schematic of model generation. Quench molecular dynamics simulations of a binary mixture (top) produce a series of networked stmcturcs which are processed into adsorbent models (bottom, shown in cutaway view.) The longer the quench is allowed to proceed, the greater the resulting pore size. The porosity of the model materials is detennined by the mole fraction of the quenched mixture.
The molecular orbital calculations for the catalyst surface models for a vacancy-free surface (ideal surface) and a surface with a sulfur vacancy (S-defect surface), respeetively, indicated that the bidentate-type adsorption of the CO2 molecule on CdS surface with a sulfur vaeancy should be more stable than the other types of adsorption, the O-end-on models and C-adsorbed models. [Pg.187]

Finally the contribution of polarization interactions may be considered in the framework of the layered adsorbent model. Starting from the expression for the electrostatic field vector created by the line possessing a charge density r ... [Pg.547]

Figure 6. Comparison of two simple crystal adsorbate models (Left) one adsorbate site and Right) two equally occupied adsorbate sites on a crystal surface. Also shown are the corresponding calculations for the coherent positions and the geometrical factors. Both models have the same average adsorbate height relative to the bulk-like diffraction plane. The two-site model has a height difference of 2 . Figure 6. Comparison of two simple crystal adsorbate models (Left) one adsorbate site and Right) two equally occupied adsorbate sites on a crystal surface. Also shown are the corresponding calculations for the coherent positions and the geometrical factors. Both models have the same average adsorbate height relative to the bulk-like diffraction plane. The two-site model has a height difference of 2 .
Evaluation of OH radicals toh ) formation presents inherent problems. The OH radicals react with both the adsorbed model pollutant and the adsorbed intermediates (Pelizzetti et al., 1992 Turchi and Ollis, 1990). Furthermore, the evaluation of the rate of OH radicals involves stochiometric coefficients such as ... [Pg.123]

D.S. Sutherland, M. Broberg, H. Nygren, B. Kasemo, Influence of nanoscale surface topography and chemistry on the functional behaviour of an adsorbed model macromolecule, Macromol. Biosd. 1... [Pg.330]

Step 3. Estimation of the adsorber FRFs. From the results of Step 2, obtained for different input amplitudes, the FRFs corresponding to different adsorber outputs are estimated, using Equations (11.1)-(11.3) and the procedure given by Lee [53]. If some of the adsorber outputs cannot be measured directly (usually that is the case with the loading Q, and sometimes with the particle temperature Fp) the FRFs corresponding to the unmeasured outputs are calculated using the adsorber model equations [55]. As a result of this step, all FRFs defined in Figure 11.3 (the Z, W, X, and Y functions) are known. [Pg.291]

Atomic force microscopy (AFM) [20] has recently been used to image interfacial aggregates directly, in situ and at nanometer resolution [21, 22], The key to this application lies in an unusual contrast mechanism, namely a pre-contact repulsive force ( colloidal stabilization force ) between the adsorbed surfactant layers on the tip and sample. In contrast to previous adsorbate models of flat monolayers and bilayers, AFM images have shown a striking variety of interfacial aggregates - spheres, cylinders, half-cylinders and bilayers - depending on the surface chemistry and surfactant geometry. I review the AFM evidence for these structures and discuss the possible inter-molecular and molecule-surface interactions involved. [Pg.233]

The extensive literature on fixed-bed adsorber modeling and analysis has been discussed elsewhere (Wankat, 1986 Yang, 1987 Suzuki, 1990 Tien, 1994 Bas-madjian, 1997 Crittenden and Thomas, 1998). The theoretical analyses primarily resort to equilibrium theory, that is, mass and heat transfer rates are assumed to be instantaneous. Because the adsorption and desorption steps in TSA are operated slowly, each spanning for hours, the equilibrium theories are indeed good. Often, quantitative agreements are obtained between theory and experiment (see... [Pg.28]

The adsorber model comprises a system of (i) three parabolic partial differential equations for the mass transport of each single component coupled by both sorption isotherm equations and an expression for the temperature dependence of rate coefficients (ii) two differential equations for chemical reaction and (iii) two parabolic partial differential equations for heat transfer. Beside time, the model contains three spatial coordinates that refer to the interstitial column volume, the macropore volume and the micropore volume and that may be of different geometry. The solution of the problem for which a module-wise algorithm was developed, is described in detail in refs. [103,104]. [Pg.333]

A recent study that adopts the associated adsorbate model of Berezin and Kiselev may prove particularly useful in elucidating heterogeneity topK>l-ogy. In their theoretical treatise, Jaroniec and Borowko assumed a dual adsorbent surface and the possibility of double associates. Thus by formulating quasi-chemical reactions ... [Pg.49]

Figure 4.9. Projection of area of an adsorbed molecule to the surface of an adsorbent (modeled). This area is used to calculate specific surface of a solid (usually porous). Figure 4.9. Projection of area of an adsorbed molecule to the surface of an adsorbent (modeled). This area is used to calculate specific surface of a solid (usually porous).
Traditionally, adsorption onto surfaces is described by isotherm equations tiat represent the isotherm with a few fitted parameters. These approaches although widely used have provided limited insight or predictive power. By contrast molecular based methods including molecular simulation and density functional methods offer both insist and accurate prediction, albeit for idealised models. . Initially, density functional theory (DFT) simulations were widely used [2,3] due to their speed. The trade off was that the adsorbate model was... [Pg.365]

The system of ordinary differential equations that constitute a batch adsorber model are solved with a numerical integration method. The International Mathematical and Statistical Library subroutine DGEAR (IMSL Inc., Houston, TX) was employed for this task. [Pg.557]

Thus, the kinetic equation of the quasiequilibrium adsorbate model involves a set of adsorption coefficients, co-existence parameters 02o ic aJid the gas ph tse pevrameters T, P. [Pg.75]

Table 3 Capacity of pseudo-polyampholytes to adsorb model proteins... Table 3 Capacity of pseudo-polyampholytes to adsorb model proteins...
Table 3 shows the capacity of these pseudo—polyampholytes to adsorb model proteins pepsin (pi 1), albumin (pi 4.6) and Chy (pi 9.2). [Pg.263]


See other pages where Adsorbent model is mentioned: [Pg.373]    [Pg.223]    [Pg.599]    [Pg.169]    [Pg.392]    [Pg.203]    [Pg.640]    [Pg.252]    [Pg.611]    [Pg.420]    [Pg.208]    [Pg.37]    [Pg.983]    [Pg.223]    [Pg.288]    [Pg.53]    [Pg.31]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.174 , Pg.176 ]




SEARCH



© 2024 chempedia.info