Adjoint action

Now consider an adjoint action of the Lie algebra Gc on itself, that is, examine the action of transformation of the form ad/ Gc — Gc, where h iTq. Since the element h lies in the Cart an subalgebra, it follows that the transformation adh carries into itself the plane orthogonal to the plane tTo. We make use of the fact that the operators ad are skew-symmetric with respect to the Killing form and therefore preserve the orthogonal complement by carrying it into itself. 

In addition, since the action of R "" operator on a virtual orbital is zero, it is seen that this adjoint will not affect the results. So that the complete H operator may... 

The Holstein-Primakoff transformation also preserves the commutation relations (70). Due to the square-root operators in Eqs. (78a)-(78d), however, the mutual adjointness of S+ and 5 as well as the self-adjointness of S3 is only guaranteed in the physical subspace 0),..., i- -m) of the transformation [219]. This flaw of the Holstein-Primakoff transformation outside the physical subspace does not present a problem on the quantum-mechanical level of description. This is because the physical subspace again is invariant under the action of any operator which results from the mapping (78) of an arbitrary spin operator A(5i, 2, 3). As has been discussed in Ref. 100, however, the square-root operators may cause serious problems in the semiclassical evaluation of the Holstein-Primakoff transformation. 

Action of an affine group scheme 21 Adjoint representation of G 100 Affine algebraic group 29 Affine group scheme 5 Algebra 3... 

The general features of the Bonnet transformation can be seen in the simplest example, namely the isometry between the catenoid and the helicoid (Fig. 1.19). Under the action of the transformation, each point on the surface traces an ellipse in space, centred at the origin. If the Cartesian coordinates of identical points on adjoint surfaces are (x,y,z) and (x",y",z"), the coordinates of an associate surface, characterised by a Bonnet angle of 0 are ... 

Thus, to solve the problem up to this point we have used the inner product, the eigenproblem and the self-adjoint property of the linear operator. It is recalled that the actions taken so far are identical to the Sturm-Liouville integral transform treated in the last section. The only difference is the element. In the present case, we are dealing with multiple elements, so the vector (rather than scalar) methodology is necessary. 

The adjoint tensor operators are particularly useful in handling of two-electron MEs and, as will be seen below, also when dealing with spin-dependent operators. The action of adjoint tensors Aij on a two-column U(n) irrep a, b) produces modules that are associated with irreps given by the Littlewood-Richardson rule as a C-G series... 

Next, in the Lie algebra so(3), we consider the (co)adjoint representation (action) of the group SO (3). It is readily seen that the orbits of this action are standard two-dimensional spheres centered at the origin. 

---