1.4- Addition/aldol-type intramolecular cascade

With this new methodology in hands, Hu et al. [166] explored the trapping of the 1,4-addition intermediate with a different electrophile for the development of a new MCR. RhjCOAc) was again the most active catalyst in the 1,4-addition/aldol-type intramolecular cascade reaction. Under the optimized reaction conditions, this three-component reaction worked well with a broad family of bifunctional substrates 135 bearing different substituents on the aryl group next to the enone moiety and a variety of alcohols 136 (Scheme 3.63). In all cases, 1-indanols 137 were obtained in 60-83% yield and with complete diastereoselectivity. Enantiopure 1-indanol was obtained employing a L-menthol-derived diazo compound. The intermolecular four-component version was also attempted, but the formation of the desired product was not observed. 

SCHEME 3.63 Synthesis of indanols by 1,4-addition/aldol-type intramolecular cascade reaction. 

Enders et al. [75] developed a synthesis of polyfunctionalized 3-(cyclohex-enylmethyl)-indoles 125 via a quadruple domino Friedel-Crafts-type Michael-Michael-aldol condensation reaction, in 2010. This cascade sequence is initiated by a Friedel-Crafts reaction of indole (126) by an iminium activation mode to the enal, followed sequentially by an enamine- and an iminium-mediated Michael addition. After an intramolecular aldol-condensation, four C-C bonds are formed and the domino product is constructed bearing three contiguous stereogenic centers (Scheme 10.34). 

In 2008, Zhang et al. succeeded in a three-component cascade reaction using achiral Ru and chiral Zr catalysis [14]. Under the influence of achiral Rh(OAc)j, oxonium ylide was generated from diazo compound 37 and alcohol 38. Consequently, this reactive intermediate was trapped by aldehyde 39 through a Lewis acid-promoted enantioselective aldol-type addition, yielding the chiral building blocks 40 with high levels of stereocontrol (Scheme 9.11). It should be noted that the presence of acidic Zr catalyst can also suppress the undesired irreversible intramolecular proton transfer of the oxonium ylide to benefit reaction pathway control. 

This catalytic cascade was first realized using propanal, nitrostyrene and cinnamaldehyde in the presence of catalytic amounts of (9TMS-protected diphenylprolinol ((.S )-71,20 mol%), which is capable of catalyzing each step of this triple cascade. In the first step, the catalyst (S)-71 activates component A by enamine formation, which then selectively adds to the nitroalkene B in a Michael-type reaction (Hayashi et al. 2005). The following hydrolysis liberates the catalyst, which is now able to form the iminium ion of the a, 3-unsaturated aldehyde C to accomplish in the second step the conjugate addition of the nitroalkane (Prieto et al. 2005). In the subsequent third step, a further enamine reactivity of the proposed intermediate leads to an intramolecular aldol condensation. Hydrolysis returns the catalyst for further cycles and releases the desired tetrasubstituted cyclohexene carbaldehyde 72 (Fig. 8) (Enders and Hiittl 2006). 

More recently, Enders et al. disclosed a facile access to tetracyclic double annulated indole derivatives 175, which basically relies on the chemistry of the acidic 2-substituted indole and its nitrogen nucleophilicity. Indeed, the employed quadruple cascade is initiated by the asymmetric aza-Michael-type A-alkylation of indole-2-methylene malono-nitrile derivative 174 to o,p-unsaturated aldehydes 95 under iminium activation (Scheme 2.57). The next weU-known enamine-iminium-enamine sequence, which practically is realized with an intramolecular Michael addition followed by a further intermolecular Michael and aldol reactions, gives access to the titled tetracyclic indole scaffold 175 with A-fused 5-membered rings annulated to cyclohexanes in both diastereo- and enantioselectivity [83]. 

---