Unstable focus stationary point

If we consider the well-stirred system, the stationary state has two Hopf bifurcation points at /r 2, where tr(U) = 0. In between these there are two values of the dimensionless reactant concentration /r 1>2 where the state changes from unstable focus to unstable node. In between these parameter values we can have (tr(U))2 — 4det(U) > 0, so there are real roots to eqn (10.76). 

Fig. 2. Types of stationary points on the plane, (a), (c), (e) Stable nodes (b), (d), (f) unstable nodes (g) saddle point (h) stable focus (i) unstable focus, (k) whirl.

With increasing values of S, as we pass the point marked by the black square, the fast subsystem undergoes a Hopf bifurcation. The complex conjugated eigenvalues cross the imaginary axis and attain positive real parts, and the stable focus is transformed into an unstable focus surrounded by a limit cycle. The stationary state, which the system approaches as initial transients die out, is now a self-sustained oscillation. This state represents the spiking behavior. 

The form of the solutions to the simplified model were analysed by examining the existence and types of the pseudo-stationary points of the equations for d0/dr = d 3/dr = 0 and values of e in the range 0—1 (r = Figure 29 shows the oscillation of a multiple-cool-flame solution about the locus of such a pseudo-stationary point, Sj. The initial oscillation is damped while Si is a stable focus. The changing of Si into a unstable focus surrounded by a stable limit cycle leads to an amplification of the oscillation which approaches the amplitude of the limit cycle. When Si reverts to a stable focus, and then a stable node, the solution approaches the locus of the pseudo-stationary point. In this way an insight may be gained into the oscillatory behaviour of multiple cool flames. 

Fig. 66. Phase trajectories in the vicinity of the stationary point of an unstable focus type.

The analysis of linearized sytem thus allows, when conditions (1)—(3) are met, us to find the shape of phase trajectories in the vicinity of stationary (singular) points. A further, more thorough examination must answer the question what happens to trajectories escaping from the neighbourhood of an unstable stationary point (unstable node, saddle, unstable focus). In a case of non-linear systems such trajectories do not have to escape to infinity. The behaviour of trajectories nearby an unstable stationary point will be examined in further subchapters using the catastrophe theory methods. 

When the parameter c < 0 the stationary state (x,y) = (0, 0) is of a stable focus type for c = 0 we deal with the sensitive state the stationary state is a centre for c > 0 a catastrophe takes place, because the stationary state becomes an unstable focus. The phase trajectories for the linearized system (5.83) for c < 0, c = 0, c > 0 nearby the stationary point are shown in Figs. 65, 66, 67, respectively. 

Hence, the stationary point (0,0) for small (as regards the absolute value) e is a stable focus and for small positive e is an unstable focus. When the parameter e changes sign, a catastrophe — a change in the nature of trajectories, takes place in the system. In addition, At 2(0) = +i hence, the state of the system corresponding to e = 0 is a sensitive state typical for the Hopf bifurcation. 

Stationary-state solutions correspond to conditions for which both numerator and denominator of (3.54) vanish, giving doc/dp = 0/0, and so are singular points in the phase plane. There will be one singular point for each stationary state each of the different local stabilities and characters found in the previous section corresponds to a different type of singularity. In fact the terms node, focus, and saddle point, as well as limit cycle, come from the patterns on the phase plane made by the trajectories as they approach or diverge. Stable stationary states or limit cycles are often refered to as attractors , unstable ones as repellors or sources . The different phase plane patterns are shown in Fig. 3.4. 

---