Triblock copolymers stress-strain properties

The mechanical and thermal properties of a range of poly(ethylene)/po-ly(ethylene propylene) (PE/PEP) copolymers with different architectures have been compared [2]. The tensile stress-strain properties of PE-PEP-PE and PEP-PE-PEP triblocks and a PE-PEP diblock are similar to each other at high PE content. This is because the mechanical properties are determined predominantly by the behaviour of the more continuous PE phase. For lower PE contents there are major differences in the mechanical properties of polymers with different architectures, that form a cubic-packed sphere phase. PE-PEP-PE triblocks were found to be thermoplastic elastomers, whereas PEP-PE-PEP triblocks behaved like particulate filled rubber. The difference was proposed to result from bridging of PE domains across spheres in PE-PEP-PE triblocks, which acted as physical crosslinks due to anchorage of the PE blocks in the semicrystalline domains. No such arrangement is possible for the PEP-PE-PEP or PE-PEP copolymers [2]. 

The stress-strain properties of the triblock copolymers showed improved elongation at break compared to those of hydrogenated homopolymers of PB and PI. The tensile strengths and moduli increased with increasing ethylene content. 

The viscoelastic properties of the crystalline zones are significantly different from those of the amorphous phase, and consequently semicrystalline polymers may be considered to be made up of two phases each with its own viscoelastic properties. The best known model to study the viscoelastic behavior of polymers was developed for copolymers as ABS (acrylonitrile-butadiene-styrene triblock copolymer). In this system, spheres of rubber are immersed in a glassy matrix. Two cases can be considered. If the stress is uniform in a polyphase, the contribution of the phases to the complex tensile compliance should be additive. However, if the strain is uniform, then the contribution of the polyphases to the complex modulus is additive. The... 

For comparison, blends were also prepared with a commercially available SEES triblock copolymer, Kraton G1652 [37]. Figure 11.11 shows stress-strain plots of Kraton G1652 and CEBC 66.32.40 with identical levels of oil. Despite the greater similarity of the solubility parameters in the CEBC polymers compared to the SEBS polymer, these materials show very similar blend elastomeric properties even up to 24% mineral oil addition. 

---