Transition metal nucleophiles oxidation potentials

Transition metal complexes are often very good nucleophiles and qualify as being supersoft under Pear son s HSAB classification for example, reaction with soft methyl iodide can be as much as 3 X 105 times faster than the reaction with hard methyl tosylate. Because soft nucleophiles are those with large a values in the Edwards equation, that rates for the transition metal nucleophiles are effectively correlated with oxidation potentials is not surprising. In the last chapter in this section, Chapter 16, Pearson uses recently obtained values of pKa for transition metal complexes to test the full Edwards... 

Rates of reaction of transition metal nucleophiles correlate both with oxidation potentials for MLn and with the pKa values of the corresponding acids, HMLn. Therefore, the two parameters, E° and H, in the Edwards equation are not independent parameters. The same result is found for other nucleophiles, if the donor atom is C,N, O, or F. However, for bases with heavier donor atoms, E° and H are not as correlated with each other. For transition metal complexes, soft ligands, L, increase acidity and decrease nucleophilic reactivity. 

A pioneering study of transition metal nucleophiles was made by Dessy et al. (7). These workers measured not only rates of reaction of various MLn with CH3I but also the oxidation potentials at a platinum electrode. A good linear relation was found when log k2 was plotted against EV2 for various nucleophiles. 

The cyclopropane ring, due to its ring strain, can be considered as a functional group comparable to the double bond with the synthetic potential to generate functionalized three carbon chains via ring opening. Besides thermal-, photochemical-, oxidative-, reductive-, radical-, nucleophile- and Lewis acid or electrophile-mediated activation, the conversion of cyclopropanes mediated by transition metals plays an important role in synthetic uses of small-ring compounds. In most of these cases, prior to conversion, a complexation of the cyclopropane system by the transition metal is necessary. 

The arguments given state that easily oxidized bases will be good nucleophiles toward alkyl halides and also strong bases toward the proton. This statement means that E° and H in the Edwards equation are no longer independent parameters but essentially one and the same property for transition metal bases. For bases where the donor atom is a nonmetal, this correlation is normally not the case. The fluoride ion is a stronger base than the iodide ion but is more difficult to oxidize. Still, examination of bases of the representative elements more closely to see if E° and H are truly independent is worthwhile. Actually E°, the redox potential in water, is not the best parameter to use. E° is measurable only for a few nucleophiles and is complicated by the nature of the products formed. For example, in... 

As many carbonate complexes are synthesized usually in aqueous solution under fairly alkaline conditions, the possibility of contamination by hydroxy species is often a problem. To circumvent this, the use of bicarbonate ion (via saturation of sodium carbonate solution with COj) rather than the carbonate ion can often avoid the precipitation of these contaminants. Many other synthetic methods use carbon dioxide as their starting point. Transition metal hydroxo complexes are, in general, capable of reacting with CO2 to produce the corresponding carbonate complex. The rate of CO2 uptake, which depends upon the nucleophilicity of the OH entity, proceeds by a mechanism that can be regarded as hydroxide addition across the unsaturated C02. There are few non-aqueous routes to carbonate complexes but one reaction (3), illustrative of a synthetic pathway of great potential, is that used to prepare platinum and copper complexes. Ruthenium and osmium carbonate complexes result from the oxidation of coordinated carbon monoxide by dioxygen insertion (4). ... 

In contrast to the photoinduced water oxidation, the mrnover rate of the electrochemical OER is decided by different kinetics and thermodynamics as determined by the applied potential. On water oxidation, surface oxy species are assumed to form independently. In the limit of high transition metal (TM) TM-oxy coverage, lateral recombination of oxy species to produce O2 becomes a competing mechanism to said nucleophilic attack. 

It should be noted that the type of cathode reaction has no direct effect on its surface chemistry. The most important aspects are the redox potentials, the particle size, and the level of reactivity of the surface oxygen atoms. Another important aspect relates to the ease of transition metal ion dissolution from the cathode material to the solution phase. In general, as the redox potential is lower, the cathode material is less reactive with the solution species. However, the redox potential is not the main important factor. The nucleophilicity and basicity of the oxygen atoms of the cathode compounds are also highly important. Li MOy compounds are much more basic and nucleophilic than LiMP04 compounds [13]. The phosphorous atoms at the 5+ oxidation state in the olivine compounds moderate the basic nature of the oxygen atoms. Thereby, olivine compounds are much less reactive to solution species than LLMOy compounds [ 14]. Consequently, they can be used as nanoparticles, which help to overcome their poor transport properties. The fluorine atoms in FeFs and its reduction product, LiF, are neither basic nor nucleophilic, and thereby this cathode material does not develop surface chemisfiy in conventional electrol)de solutions. Finally, as the particle size of cathode materials is smaller, they are supposed to be more surface reactive. 

---