Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Transformed Triangles

So we have indeed defined a triangulation and from (Al)", (A3), and (1.4.4.1) we conclude that this is the unique triangulation on D with translation T and such that Q transforms triangles into triangles. [Pg.24]

Solution 3.2 Figure 3.6 shows the plots one should obtain from the program. Note that the plots shown include dashed, straight lines which trace the movement of pinch points. Collectively these lines produce a triangle, known in the context of CPMs as a transformed triangle (TT). The importance and use of the TTs are discussed in greater detail in Section 3.6.5. [Pg.57]

It is worthwhile noting that both Examples 5.1 and 5.2 are ternary problems, and profile behavior can as such be easily visualized in a two-dimensional space. It is also entirely possible, in the case of Example 5.1 where constant volatilities have been assumed, to plot the transformed triangles (TTs) for the problem to interpret where a particular profile will tend toward, or whether there may be instability issues because the profile is closely approaching a saddle node. Analogous analyses can be performed for nonideal systems too, as shown in Example 5.2. Generating profiles and pinch points with DODS-ProPlot is rather simple for such systems and is not shown explicitly here. [Pg.124]

Figure 7.4 shows that the Amplified DPE with the difference vector behaves in much the same way as the original DPE where profiles have been altered and nodes have been shifted even outside the positive composition space. As before, with constant relative volatility systems, we are able to connect the (shifted) nodes with straight lines to form a transformed triangle (TT). [Pg.211]

These four steps are illustrated in Fig. 40.17 where two triangles (array of 32 data points) are convoluted via the Fourier domain. Because one should multiply Fourier coefficients at corresponding frequencies, the signal and the point-spread function should be digitized with the same time interval. Special precautions are needed to avoid numerical errors, of which the discussion is beyond the scope of this text. However, one should know that when J(t) and h(t) are digitized into sampled arrays of the size A and B respectively, both J(t) and h(t) should be extended with zeros to a size of at least A + 5. If (A -i- B) is not a power of two, more zeros should be appended in order to use the fast Fourier transform. [Pg.534]

It is instructive to consider a specific example of the method outline above. The triangle fimction (l/l) a (x/l) was discussed in Section 11.1.2. It was pointed out there that it arises in dispersive spectroscopy as the slit function for a monochromator, while in Fourier-transform spectroscopy it is often used as an apodizing function. Its Fourier transform is the function sine2, as shown in Fig. (11-2). The eight points employed to construct the normalized triangle fimction define the matrix... [Pg.175]

Fourier transforms boxcar function 274 Cauchy function 276 convolution 272-273 Dirac delta function 277-279 Gaussian function 275-276 Lorentzian function 276-277 shah function 277-279 triangle function 275 fraction, rational algebraic 47 foil width at half maximum (FWHM) 55, 303... [Pg.205]

Fig. 7. Effect of pH on the EPR spectrum recorded at —100° of sulphite oxidase reduced by sulphite. The species present at low pH values, which shows proton splitting, is replaced by another species at high pH. The pH. for the transformation is about 8.2, In (A), maxima and minima in the derivative spectra are denoted by the numbers 1—7. In (B) changes in the spectra are plotted as a function of pH. with values at pH 7.2 taken as 100% and those at pH 9.2 taken as 0%, or vice versa. The features in the spectra measured were height of the 1 and 2 doublet (open circles) height of the peak at 3 (squares) distance between 4 and 5 (triangles) and height of 7 (diagonal crosses). (Reproduced from ref. 15, with the permission of Dr. K. V. Rajagopalan.)... Fig. 7. Effect of pH on the EPR spectrum recorded at —100° of sulphite oxidase reduced by sulphite. The species present at low pH values, which shows proton splitting, is replaced by another species at high pH. The pH. for the transformation is about 8.2, In (A), maxima and minima in the derivative spectra are denoted by the numbers 1—7. In (B) changes in the spectra are plotted as a function of pH. with values at pH 7.2 taken as 100% and those at pH 9.2 taken as 0%, or vice versa. The features in the spectra measured were height of the 1 and 2 doublet (open circles) height of the peak at 3 (squares) distance between 4 and 5 (triangles) and height of 7 (diagonal crosses). (Reproduced from ref. 15, with the permission of Dr. K. V. Rajagopalan.)...
Fig. 1. Transmission mechanisms. Strain barrier PrPc (circle) interacts with different strains of PrPSc (square or triangle). The replicated PrPSc is similar to the template. The 3F4 epitope is not recognized when it is in PrPSc, but is exposed after pardal denaturation by GdnHCI so that it is detected by the antibody. Antibody reactivity depends on the particular strain of PrP (Safar et aL, 1998). Species barrier when the template PrPSc contains unfavorable residues at the binding interface, the transformation of PrPc to Pr l>Sr does not occur. In vitro replication 35S label of PrPc is detected in PrPSc after replication in a medium containing GdnHCI (Kocisko et aL, 1994). Fig. 1. Transmission mechanisms. Strain barrier PrPc (circle) interacts with different strains of PrPSc (square or triangle). The replicated PrPSc is similar to the template. The 3F4 epitope is not recognized when it is in PrPSc, but is exposed after pardal denaturation by GdnHCI so that it is detected by the antibody. Antibody reactivity depends on the particular strain of PrP (Safar et aL, 1998). Species barrier when the template PrPSc contains unfavorable residues at the binding interface, the transformation of PrPc to Pr l>Sr does not occur. In vitro replication 35S label of PrPc is detected in PrPSc after replication in a medium containing GdnHCI (Kocisko et aL, 1994).
The chemistry of the 1 1 and 1 2 complexes differs with respect to hydrogenation (84,89). The 1 2 derivatives are inert to hydrogenation, while the 1 1 compounds are smoothly transformed into an ethylidene complex (see Scheme 1). This difference in behavior may well reflect the cause of differences in behavior of olefins on metal surfaces toward hydrogenation. The ethylidene complex may be converted back to the olefin adduct by reaction with trityl ion. The ethylidene adduct was first obtained for ruthenium by interaction of ethylene with H RujfCO) (89), and is structurally related to the corresponding cobalt derivatives, Co3(CO)9RC. As discussed above, the structure has been established in detail and involves a capping of the metal triangle... [Pg.280]

This, of course, involves no approximation whatsoever. The special case is included in the program in Table 14.1. The general formula given in Eq. (14.23) gives exact Fourier transformations of any functions that have straight-line segments. Therefore triangles, trapezoids, etc., are handled with no approximation at alt. [Pg.515]

Figure 4. Calculations of the He ground-state energy in subsets of a I9sI6pl4dl2fl0g8h6i4kbasis, y=0, c-1/2. The circles represent the similarity-transformed results and the triangles the conventional results. Figure 4. Calculations of the He ground-state energy in subsets of a I9sI6pl4dl2fl0g8h6i4kbasis, y=0, c-1/2. The circles represent the similarity-transformed results and the triangles the conventional results.
Formally, we call the set of reaction solvable, if there exists a linear transformation of coordinates a- a such that kinetic equation in new coordinates for all values of reaction constants has the triangle form ... [Pg.161]

Einally, we should mention connections between solvable reaction networks and solvable Lie algebras (de Graaf, 2000 Jacobson, 1979). Let us remind that matrices Mi,..., generate a solvable Lie algebra if and only if they could be transformed simultaneously into a triangle form by a change of basis. [Pg.163]

Determine the sum of the lengths of the hypotenuses of the right triangles for each placement of the transformer. [Pg.262]


See other pages where Transformed Triangles is mentioned: [Pg.72]    [Pg.193]    [Pg.280]    [Pg.329]    [Pg.373]    [Pg.72]    [Pg.193]    [Pg.280]    [Pg.329]    [Pg.373]    [Pg.208]    [Pg.62]    [Pg.26]    [Pg.146]    [Pg.146]    [Pg.202]    [Pg.353]    [Pg.353]    [Pg.385]    [Pg.156]    [Pg.290]    [Pg.372]    [Pg.249]    [Pg.162]    [Pg.226]    [Pg.269]    [Pg.80]    [Pg.80]    [Pg.126]    [Pg.33]    [Pg.261]    [Pg.243]    [Pg.163]    [Pg.2]    [Pg.306]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.57 , Pg.58 , Pg.72 , Pg.75 , Pg.88 , Pg.89 , Pg.124 ]




SEARCH



Design with Transformed Triangles

Transformed triangle sections

Triangle

© 2024 chempedia.info