Torsion-free

In the last part, we use the fact that X is a K3 surface or an abelian surface. For the proof of the non-degeneracy and the closedness, we refer to [56]. In Chapter 3, we shall show that the framed moduli space of torsion free sheaves on has a holomorphic symplectic form. 

The relation between the two theorems is as follows. Let be a rank I torsion free sheaf on X, then its double dual is locally free. There exists a natural inclusion 8 and the cokernel dehnes an element in If we associate 8 with 8 8 /8) ... 

Framed moduli space of torsion free sheaves on... 

Throughout this note from this chapter, we assume k = C. Let M.r,n be the framed moduli space of torsion free sheaves on with rank r and C2 = n, i.e. 

FRAMED MODULI SPACE OF TORSION FREE SHEAVES ON... 

The main idea of the proof of the theorem is the Beilinson spectral sequence which gives the monad description of a torsion free sheaf A on P. ... 

Lemma 2.3. Let E be a torsion free sheaf on which is locally free on oo, then... 

As remarked before, we can identify the framed moduli space A4i,n of rank 1 torsion free sheaves with Hence our description should be the same as that in Theorem 1.14. 

Model building remains a useful technique for situations where the data are not amenable to solution in any other way, and for which existing related crystal structures can be used as a starting point. This usually happens because of a combination of structural complexity and poor data quality. For recent examples of this in the structure solution of polymethylene chains see Dorset [21] and [22]. It is interesting to note that model building methods for which there is no prior information are usually unsuccessful because the data are too insensitive to the atomic coordinates. This means that the recent advances in structure solution from powder diffraction data (David et al. [23]) in which a model is translated and rotated in a unit cell and in which the torsional degrees of freedom are also sampled by rotating around bonds which are torsionally free will be difficult to apply to structure solution with electron data. 

As remarked before, we can identify the framed moduli space A4iiTl of rank 1 torsion free sheaves with (C2). Hence our description should be the same as that in Theorem 1.14. The difference in those descriptions is the appearance of j in Theorem 2.1. In fact, this is not the difference because we have... 

Conversely assume that the condition is satisfied, let x X and s = f(x). We must show that is 0Ss-flat. If s is the generic point this is true. If s is a closed point then 0Ss is a DVR and it follows from (5) that it suffices to show that 0cXx is torsion free. If this were false f (u) would be a zero-divisor, that is f (u) would be contained in an associated prime p of (0) in 0 X But then p would correspond to a point x in Ass(X) such that f(x ) = s and this is a contradiction... 

Compounds such as y-dimethylvalerophenones (8) and P-ethoxypropiophenone (9), which lack y— H, produce exclusively cyclopentanol 10 and tetrahydrofuranol 11 derivatives, respectively, albeit in low quantum yields (Scheme 8.2). With benzene as solvent, the diastereomeric ratio for 11 was 5 1 (trans/cis), but was 1 1 in acetonitrile. The easy 1,5-H-transfer in these acyclic ketones was rationalized as involving a torsion-free, chair-like six-membered transition state. 

---