Through-bond coupling spin preferences

The Hydrogen Atom 811 Methane—Molecular Orbitals or Discrete Single Bonds with sp Hybrids 827 Koopmans Theorem—A Connection Between Ab Initio Calculations and Experiment 828 A Matrix Approach to Setting Up the LCAO Method 832 Through-Bond Coupling and Spin Preferences 861 Cy clobu tadiene at the Two-Electron Level of Theory 862... 

T Tj and cross peaks are clearly observed as would be expected from the known structure. The structure of the T2T3 cross-peak is real and is due to the partial resolution of the T3 resonance. Identical connectivities are obtained by two-dimensional spin diffusion experiments based on dipolar interactions, but data based on scalar couplings are prefered because they operate through the Si-O-Si bonding network. 

This process of constructing functions for the various resonant formulae, followed by an adequate combination of them, is mathematically more complex than the mathematics of molecular orbital theory. It is therefore understandable that, after the initial preference of chemists for the v.b. bond theory which has a closer relation to Lewis structures - especially due to the contribution of Linus Pauling - m.o. theory became increasingly popular. In addition, m.o. theory leads directly, not only to fundamental states (through the occupied m.o.), but also to excited states (through vacant m.o.) of molecules. In recent years, however, a new form of valence-bond theory has been developed that is more amenable to computation (spin-coupled valence-bond theory) in which the molecular wavefunction is expressed as a linear combination of all the coupling schemes of the various electrons corresponding to the same resultant spin (ref. 97). 

Fermi contact coupling mechanism between two protons through a single bond (the coupling constant Jab denoted as Jhh)- The proton and the electron close to it prefer to have opposite spins. Fig. 12.17. Then the other electron of the bond (being closer to the other nucleus) shows the other nucleus the spin of first nucleus, so the second nucleus prefers to have the opposite... 

Fig. 12.17. Is the proton-proton coupling constant through two bonds (H-C-H), i.e., Juu positive or negative Recall that Jhh >0 (shown in Fig. 12.14a), where the induction mechanism is described. The interaction through two bonds depends on what happens at the central carbon atom are the spins of the two electrons there (one from each bond C-H) parallel or antiparallel Hund s rule suggests they prefer to be parallel This means that the situation with the two proton spins parallel is more energetically favorable, and this means JhH < 0. This rule of thumb may fail when the carbon atom participates in multiple bonds, as in ethylene. For more information, see the section Fwm the Research Fnmt," later in this drapter.

---