Thermal stimulated current

In a similar fashion. Thermally Stimulated Current spectrometry (TSC) makes use of an appHed d-c potential that acts as the stress to orient dipoles. The temperature is then lowered to trap these dipoles, and small electrical currents are measured during heating as the dipoles relax. The resulting relaxation maps have been related to G and G" curves obtained by dynamic mechanical analysis (244—246). This technique, long carried out only in laboratory-built instmments, is available as a commercial TSC spectrometer from Thermold Partners L.P., formerly Solomat Instmments (247). 

The electrical current of a coplanar interdigilal gold/LPPP/gold device is space charge limited due to p-type charge earner traps localized in the bandgap [28]. This can be inferred from the field dependence of the dark current at room temperature. The thermally stimulated current spectrum exhibits two peaks, corresponding to two distinct trap levels ,1 and ,", which can be calculated from the rise in current, /, below the peak temperature ... 

In order to study the chaiged photoexcitalions in conjugated materials in detail their contribution to chaige transport can be measured. One possible experiment is to measure thermally stimulated currents (TSC). Next, we will compare the results of the TSC-expcrimenls, which are sensitive to mobile thermally released charges trapped after photoexcilation, to the temperature dependence of the PIA signal (see Fig. 9-17) which is also due to charged states as discussed previously. 

Thermally stimulated currents in unbiased short-circuited oxides. 

Thermally stimulated creep (TSCr) method, 21 742-743 Thermally stimulated current spectrometry (TSC), 21 743 Thermal mass meters, 20 681 Thermal mechanical analysis (TMA), of polyester fibers, 20 21 Thermal motion, in silicon-based semiconductors, 22 237-238 Thermal noise, silicon-based semiconductors and, 22 237 Thermal oxidation, 10 77-78, 79 in VOC control, 20 683-685 Thermal oxidation rates, silicon, 22 490 Thermal oxidizers... 

Modification of Electrical Properties in Poly-iV-Vinylcarbazole by UV Light—Thermally Stimulated Current... 

So-called thermally stimulated current is the most direct method to investigate the nature of the traps, the current being due to the carriers comming out thermally from the traps. Although the thermally stimulated current of poly-N-vinylcarbazole has already been investigated by Pai (3) and Patora (4), the results are somewhat different. We investigated this problem with many... 

Annealing and cleaning up of the eventually existing residual trapped carriers filling up of the traps with UV-irradiation and the measurement of thermally stimulated currenT... 

Figure 2. Thermally stimulated current of poly-N-vinylcarbazole film (i) The current observed for the first time without any pretreatment (ii) the same after this first measurement (collecting voltage 30V (Au- -) heating rate 3.3°C/min)...

Fig. 4 (a) and (b) explain the principle. This is the thermally stimulated current to be used for the analysis of the trap depth and its population. In so far as the film has no experience of being heated above 110°C, the same film assembly could be used repeatedly many times with satisfactory reproducible results. 

Measurement of the thermally stimulated current of the poly-N-vinylcarbazole film irradiated prior to the measurement with UV-light in air at room temperature. 

Prior to the measurement of the thermally stimulated current, the film was irradiated at room temperature with the total UV-light from the same 500W Hg lamp. The whole was evacuated and the film was cooled down to -150°C, irradiated with Hg lamp to fill up the traps and the measurement of thermally stimulated current was performed in the same way as stated above. 

Figure 4. Principle of the measurement of thermally stimulated current (a) when the sample is irradiated at —150°C photocarriers are generated and the traps are filled with the carriers (b) measurement of the thermally stimulated current...

Fig. 5 shows the thermally stimulated current of poly-N-vinylcarbazole measured with the above mentioned method. 

As to be noticed in Fig. 5, the 5°C peak shows considerable tailing to the lower temperature region. This means the presence of some amount of shallower trapps in the polymer. As shown by Fig. 7, the thermally stimulated current from these traps becomes somewhat clearer with slower heating rate. However, the density of these traps is too small to analyze. Pai and Patora show also the presence of such kind of traps [3), (4). 

As shown in Figs. 2,5 and 7, the curves show large thermally stimulated current in higher temperature region also. It is difficult, however, to observe any maximum in this current and is impossible to analyze the trap parameters. 

Figure 6. Typical experimental curve of the thermally stimulated current in poly-N-vinylcarbazole near 5°C peak...

Figure 7. Thermally stimulated current in poly-N-vinylcarbazole with different heating rates (1.7-6.7°C/min collecting voltage 30V (Au+)). Films were cleaned first ana UV illuminated for 20 min at —150°C in vacuo with the total light of the Hg lamp of Figure 3.

As shown in Fig. 8, when the film is irradiated at room temperature in air by UV-light, thermally stimulated current at 5°C increases considerably. This result shows clearly the increase of the density of the same 0.56 eV traps. 

Figure 8. Thermally stimulated current in photooxidized poly- S-vinylcarbazole film. Films are (i) not illuminated (ii) illuminated for 60 min (Hi) illuminated for 2 min with the 330-nm UV light in air at room temperature. In all cases, these photo-oxidized films were cleaned by heating to 100°C prior to the measurement, cooled to —1S0°C, and illuminated with the total light of the Hg lamp for 20 min in vacuo.

On the methods of analysis of the thermally stimulated current and the values of the trap depth in poly-N-vinyl-carbazole... 

It is also necessary to note that the success of TSR techniques to obtain information on trapping states in the gap depends on whether or not the experiment can be performed under conditions that justify equation (1.2) to be reduced to simple expressions for the kinetic process. Usually, the kinetic theory of TSR phenomena in bulk semiconductors—such as thermoluminescence, thermally stimulated current, polarization, and depolarization— has been interpreted by simple kinetic equations that were arrived at for reasons of mathematical simplicity only and that had no justified physical basis. The hope was to determine the most important parameters of traps— namely, the activation energies, thermal release probabilities, and capture cross section— by fitting experimental cnrves to those oversimplified kinetic descriptions. The success of such an approach seems to be only marginal. This situation changed after it was reahzed that TSR experiments can indeed be performed under conditions that justify the use of simple theoretical approaches for the determination of trapping parameters ... 

A detailed discussion of the statistical thermodynamic aspects of thermally stimulated dielectric relaxation is not provided here. It should suffice to state that kinetics of most of the processes are again complicated and that the phenomenological kinetic theories used to described thermally stimulated currents make use of assumptions that, being necessary to simplify the formalism, may not always be justified. Just as in the general case, TSL and TSC, the spectroscopic information may in principle be available from the measurement of thermally stimulated depolarization current (TSDC). However, it is frequently impossible to extract it unambiguously from such experiments. 

The method of field-induced thermally stimulated current (FITSC) consists of measuring— according to a definite (usually linear) heating scheme—the currents generated by the buildup and release of a polarized state in a high-resistivity solid... 

Figure 1.5 (a and b) Typical electrode configurations used for the measurements of thermally stimulated currents. The sample surface ceU (a) may be augmented by additional contacts (b)-(d) to monitor potential distribution along the sample. The sandwich cell (e)-(h) is ideally suited for the use of guard rings of either rectangular or circular shapes. 

Petroff and Lang (1977) combined DLTS with scanning electron microscopy in a method that allows spatial imaging of deep states in the plane of a junction. The scanned electron beam is pulsed on and off and the resulting thermally stimulated current or capacitance transient is analyzed using the usual DLTS methods. 

Fig. 4. Energy below the conduction band of levels reported in the literature for GaP. States are arranged from top to bottom chronologically, then by author. At the left is an indication of the method of sample growth or preparation liquid phase epitaxy (LPE), liquid encapsulated Czochralski (LEC), irradiated with 1-MeV electrons (1-MeV e), and vapor phase epitaxy (VPE). Next to this the experimental method is listed photoluminescence (PL), photoluminescence decay time (PLD), junction photocurrent (PCUR), photocapacitance (PCAP), transient capacitance (TCAP), thermally stimulated current (TSC), transient junction dark current (TC), deep level transient spectroscopy (DLTS), photoconductivity (PC), and optical absorption (OA).

Some recent thermally stimulated current (TSC) data obtained by Martin and Bois (1978) are shown in Fig. 8. Here the maximum occurs at 264°K, giving Ei0 0.61 eV,forcrBj 10-1S cm2. Evidently, a was not varied in this experiment. Note that the dark current begins to increase rapidly near room temperature in these data. Here our analysis must break down since capture... 

---