Thermal randomization differential analysis

Differential thermal analysis has been used for the measurement of crystallinity of random and block ethylene-methacrylate copolymers [30] and of polybutene [31], PET, 1,4-cyclohexanedimethyl terephthalate, and polypropylene (PP) [32, 33] and in the examination of morphologically different structures of PE ionomers [34]. 

In Additional to these tensile stresses, some random tensile stresses are introduced due to differential cooling strains which cannot be covered by analysis constructional stresses locked in, local stress concentration and thermal gradient stresses are some more to be considered while assessing the amount of reinforcement. 

Differences in the pyrograms of block and random copolymers allow estimation of comonomer distribution. Random copolymers of ethylene with methyl acrylate or methyl methacrylate yield on pyrolysis a lower ratio of methanol/methyl acrylate or methanol/methyl methacrylate, respectively, than block polymers of the same composition. Differential thermal analysis measurements give a first-order transition for block polymers only, and by measuring the area under the transition, an indication of the minimum chain length between acrylate units can be obtained. 

Nakano et al [160] prepared a copolymer of poly(vinyl acetate) and methacrylic acid by irradiation at 200 kHz. From measurements of viscoelasticity and from differential thermal analysis, it was concluded that the copolymer was of the block type. The glass transition temperature of this block copolymer was surprisingly reported to be much lower than those of random and graft copolymers. 

If much well-ordered kaolinite is present, the assymmetric peaks are not prominent in the patterns from random samples, and the basal reflections are sharper and much enhanced in intensities in patterns from oriented samples. If much disordered kaolinite is present, the assymmetric peaks are prominent in the first patterns, and the basal reflections are much enhanced in the second. Chemical pretreatments prior to X-ray diffraction, such as those proposed by Wada [1965] and Alexiades and Jackson [1965], are sometimes useful in determining amounts of kaolinite and halloysite. Where the halloysite is tubular, it is easily detected in electron micrographs, although the amount can seldom be determined. Amounts of hydrated halloysite can be determined if allophane is not present in differential thermal analysis by calibrating and measuring the low-temperature endothermic peak. 

On differential thermal curves for vermiculites and saponites, as already mentioned, a small endothermic peak can occur at about 600°C associated with a small exothermic peak at 800 to 900°C. This normally indicates the interstratification of some brucite layers (see Figure 20), but these are frequently so few (or incomplete) and so randomly interstratified that their presence is not revealed on the X-ray pattern. Differential thermal analysis is, therefore, a particularly sensitive method of detection. 

---