Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Su-Schrieffer-Heeger model

Wan et al.236 have used the Su-Schrieffer-Heeger model to calculate a for five different C78 isomers and predict a great variation of optical properties with symmetry and shape. [Pg.28]

One of the interesting predictions of the Su-Schrieffer-Heeger model [158, 159] is that the electronic excitations are closely related to the topological distortions of the conjugated polyene chain. It is predicted that solitons are the elementary excitations both for optical... [Pg.193]

Fig. 2.7. The bond stretching mode of trana-CB.x projected onto the a -axis. 2.8.2 The Su-Schrieffer-Heeger model... Fig. 2.7. The bond stretching mode of trana-CB.x projected onto the a -axis. 2.8.2 The Su-Schrieffer-Heeger model...
The Su-Schrieffer-Heeger model in the limit of static nuclei is known as the Peierls model. This is defined and discussed in Section 4.2. [Pg.20]

In this chapter we describe the consequences of electron-phonon coupling in the absence of electron-electron interactions. The celebrated model for studying this limit is the so-called Su-Schrieffer-Heeger model (Su et al. 1979, 1980), defined in Section 2.8.2. In the absence of lattice dynamics this model is known as the Peierls model. We begin by describing the predictions of this model, namely the Peierls mechanism for bond alternation in the ground state and bond defects in the excited states. Finally, we reintroduce lattice dynamics classically and briefly describe amplitude-breathers. [Pg.39]

In the limit that the coherence length is much larger than the lattice spacing, and provided that we are only interested in the low energy physics near to the Fermi surface, a continuum version of the Su-Schrieffer-Heeger model can be derived. This model, derived by Takayama, Lin-Liu, and Maki, is known as the TML model (Takayama et al. 1980). It provides useful analytical results that agree with the Su-Schrieffer-Heeger model in the continuum limit. [Pg.55]

So far in this chapter we have described the static geometrical distortions associated with the electronic states, without paying much regard as to how these distortions arise dynamically. In this section we briefly describe the predicted dynamics of the Su-Schrieffer-Heeger model (introduced in Section 2.8.2). [Pg.57]

The Su-Schrieffer-Heeger model alone is too simplistic to realistically model excited states in conjugated polymers, as electron-electron interactions lead to significantly different predictions. The study of breathers within an interacting electron model has been performed by Takimato and Sasai (1989) and Tretiak et al. (2003). [Pg.57]

The BLA in conjugated polymers can be very well described by an improved Hiickel-type method, the sem-iempirical Longuet-Higgins-Salem (LHS) model [7, 8]. The corresponding solid-state physics approximation is the Su-Schrieffer-Heeger model [9, 10]. The relationship between the LHS and the SSH models was pointed out in Ref. [11]. [Pg.82]


See other pages where Su-Schrieffer-Heeger model is mentioned: [Pg.119]    [Pg.6]    [Pg.15]    [Pg.1423]    [Pg.386]    [Pg.7]    [Pg.20]    [Pg.55]    [Pg.57]    [Pg.57]    [Pg.57]    [Pg.460]    [Pg.36]    [Pg.313]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.8 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.20 ]




SEARCH



Dynamics of the Su-Schrieffer-Heeger model

Schrieffer

Schrieffer-Heeger model

Su-Schrieffer-Heeger

The Su-Schrieffer-Heeger model

© 2024 chempedia.info