Structural exclusion criteria

The first application of a computational method to select structurally diverse compounds for purchase started in 1992 at the Upjohn Company, which predated the formation of Pharmacia Upjohn by about three years. The basic approach selected compounds using a method based upon maximum dissimilarity and was implemented using SAS software [11]. This later evolved into the program Dfragall, which was written in C and is described in Section 13.6.3. Basically, a set of compounds that is maximally dissimilar from the corporate compound collection is chosen from the set of available vendor compounds. Early versions of the process relied solely on diversity-based metrics but it was found that many nondrug like compounds were identified. As a result, structural exclusion criteria were developed to eliminate compounds that were considered unsuitable for... 

The preceding discussion has shown that the major course of the reduction of multiply unsaturated compounds can be understood in terms of a relatively small number of elementary reactions. Other reactions have been postulated for various reasons and it is obviously desirable to find criteria for judging the probable importance of the many conceivable changes. Perhaps the most important criterion is an experimental one which is coupled with the principle of minimum structural change. Thus the demonstration that 2-butyne yields, almost exclusively, cis-2-butene-2,3-du implies that the structure (A), a logical... 

In the example of structure 4.2c just above, we have to handle 89,667 abstract POFs. In this subsection we provide criteria that allow the exclusion of most of these from further examination. A first criterion is that the four neighbors of a carbon atom certainly should not be placed in one plane, see Figure 4.5a. Thus we apply... 

---