Stress tensor elastic dumbbell model

In Chapter 6, we derived the stress tensor for the elastic dumbbell model. By following the derivation steps given there, one obtains the following result for the Rouse chain model with N beads per chain, which is equivalent to Eq. (6.50) for the elastic dumbbell model ... 

It is interesting to examine the bead-spring models to see what flow-induced configurational changes would be required in order to develop N2 values of the proper magnitude and sign. In the Rouse model, the components of the stress tensor are related directly to averages of the internal coordinates of the beads. For the simplest case of the elastic dumbbell ... 

The starting point of a molecular constitutive theory is a simple mechanical model for the molecule that captures its most salient traits. Thus, flexible polymer molecules have been represented by elastic dumbbells and bead-spring chains, and rigid polymers by rigid dumbbells and rigid rods. For its simplicity, the evolution of the model molecule is easily described by a convection-diffusion equation. Then a Fokker-Planck equation is written for the probability distribution function of an ensemble of these molecules. Finally, the macroscopic stress tensor is derived in terms of the distribution function. This kinetic theory framework was pioneered by Kirkwood (see, for example, Ref. ). 

The simplest model for dilute polymer solutions is to idealize the polymer molecule as an elastic dumbbell consisting of two beads connected by a Hookean spring immersed in a viscous fluid (Fig. 2.1). The spring has an elastic constant Hq. Each bead is associated with a frictional factor C and a negligible mass. If the instantaneous locations of the two beads in space are riand r2, respectively, then the end-to-end vector, R = ri — ri, describes the overall orientation and the internal conformation of the polymer molecule. The polymer-contributed stress tensor can be related to the second-order moment of R. There are two expressions namely the Kramers expression and the Giesekus expression, respectively (Bird et al. 1987b) ... 

---