Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Spin-pairing energy, effect spectra

It is relevant to note at this point that, because the metal ions are isoelcctronic, the spectra of low-spin Fe complexes might be expected to be similar to those of low-spin Co ". However, Fe" requires a much stronger crystal field to effect spin-pairing and the ligands which provide such a field also give rise to low-energy charge-transfer bands which almost always obscure the d-d bands. Nevertheless, the spectrum of the pale-yellow [Fe(CN)f,] shows a shoulder at... [Pg.1128]

Figure 1 Sketch of the Zeeman and quadrupolar energy levels for a nucleus having spin /= 1. The effect of the quadrupolar interaction is to destroy the degeneracy between the two pairs of energy levels, so the NMR spectrum, which is a single line at the Larmor frequency for the Zeeman interaction alone, becomes a doublet centered on the Larmor frequency. Figure 1 Sketch of the Zeeman and quadrupolar energy levels for a nucleus having spin /= 1. The effect of the quadrupolar interaction is to destroy the degeneracy between the two pairs of energy levels, so the NMR spectrum, which is a single line at the Larmor frequency for the Zeeman interaction alone, becomes a doublet centered on the Larmor frequency.
Figure 2.3 Perturbations and predissociations affect absorption and emission line intensities in quite different ways. Two pairs of absorption and emission spectra are shown. The first pair illustrates the disappearance of a weakly predissociated line in emission without any detectable intensity or lineshape alteration in absorption. The second pair shows that emission from upper levels with slow radiative decay rates can be selectively quenched by collision induced energy transfer. The opposite effect, selective collisional enhancement of emission from perturbed, longer-lived levels, is well known in CN B2 +—X2 +(u = 0,v") emission spectra (see Fig. 6.14 and Section 6.5.5). (a) the CO B1S+—X1S+(1,0) band in emission (top) and absorption (bottom). The last strong lines in emission are 11(16) and P(18). Emission from levels with J > 17 is weak because the predissociation rate is larger than the spontaneous emission rate. (Courtesy F. Launay and J. Y. Roncin.) (6) The CO A ll—X1 + (0,0) band in emission (bottom) and absorption (top). The a 3 + —X1 +(8,0) band lines appear in absorption because the A1 FI a 3 + spin-orbit interaction causes a small amount of A1 character to be admixed into the nominal a 3 + levels. These a —X lines are absent from the emission spectrum because collisional quenching and radiative decay into a3II compete more effectively with radiative decay into X1 + from the long-lived a 3 + state than from the short-lived A1 state. In addition, collisions and radiative decay into a3II cause the P(31) extra line (E) (arising from a perturbation by d3A v = 4) to be weakened in emission relative to the main line (M). (Courtesy F. Launay, A. Le Floch, and J. Rostas.)... Figure 2.3 Perturbations and predissociations affect absorption and emission line intensities in quite different ways. Two pairs of absorption and emission spectra are shown. The first pair illustrates the disappearance of a weakly predissociated line in emission without any detectable intensity or lineshape alteration in absorption. The second pair shows that emission from upper levels with slow radiative decay rates can be selectively quenched by collision induced energy transfer. The opposite effect, selective collisional enhancement of emission from perturbed, longer-lived levels, is well known in CN B2 +—X2 +(u = 0,v") emission spectra (see Fig. 6.14 and Section 6.5.5). (a) the CO B1S+—X1S+(1,0) band in emission (top) and absorption (bottom). The last strong lines in emission are 11(16) and P(18). Emission from levels with J > 17 is weak because the predissociation rate is larger than the spontaneous emission rate. (Courtesy F. Launay and J. Y. Roncin.) (6) The CO A ll—X1 + (0,0) band in emission (bottom) and absorption (top). The a 3 + —X1 +(8,0) band lines appear in absorption because the A1 FI a 3 + spin-orbit interaction causes a small amount of A1 character to be admixed into the nominal a 3 + levels. These a —X lines are absent from the emission spectrum because collisional quenching and radiative decay into a3II compete more effectively with radiative decay into X1 + from the long-lived a 3 + state than from the short-lived A1 state. In addition, collisions and radiative decay into a3II cause the P(31) extra line (E) (arising from a perturbation by d3A v = 4) to be weakened in emission relative to the main line (M). (Courtesy F. Launay, A. Le Floch, and J. Rostas.)...

See other pages where Spin-pairing energy, effect spectra is mentioned: [Pg.145]    [Pg.28]    [Pg.138]    [Pg.1128]    [Pg.139]    [Pg.49]    [Pg.66]    [Pg.204]    [Pg.132]    [Pg.133]    [Pg.452]    [Pg.20]    [Pg.97]    [Pg.49]    [Pg.170]    [Pg.318]    [Pg.3812]    [Pg.22]    [Pg.890]    [Pg.891]    [Pg.464]    [Pg.198]    [Pg.129]    [Pg.121]    [Pg.3811]    [Pg.28]    [Pg.36]    [Pg.101]    [Pg.66]    [Pg.3259]    [Pg.54]    [Pg.22]    [Pg.268]    [Pg.156]    [Pg.89]    [Pg.9]    [Pg.131]    [Pg.948]    [Pg.371]    [Pg.16]    [Pg.441]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.76 , Pg.78 ]




SEARCH



Effective pairs

Pair energy

Paired spins

Spectra effect

Spin effects

Spin pairs

Spin-pairing

Spin-pairing energy

© 2024 chempedia.info