Systems of equations solving

For solving systems of equations, only local methods are available. Let the equations be given in the form... 

By now some of you must be thinking that there must be an easier way to solve systems of equations than wrestling with manual row operations. Well, of course there are better ways, which is why we will refresh your memory on the concept of determinants in the next chapter. After we have introduced determinants we will conclude our introductory coverage of matrix algebra and MLR with some final remarks. 

The relative ease of solving the system of non-linear equations for rather complex equilibrium problems, as indicated by the shortness of the function NewtonRaphson. m and by the inconsequentiality of poor initial guesses, is misleading. As we will see shortly, this statement is particularly pertinent to cases of general systems of m equations with m parameters. Solving systems of equations is a common task and we give a short introduction. To start with, we investigate the simple case of one equation with one parameter. 

The most common applications of the Monte Carlo method in numerical computation are for evaluating integrals. Monte Cario methods can also be used in solving systems of equations. All instances of Monte Carlo simulation can be reduced to the evaluation of a definite integral like the following ... 

A quadratic equation occurs when you have one or more terms containing a variable raised to the second power. For example, the equation y = Sx2 + 2x is a quadratic equation. Solving systems of equations involving quadratic equations leads to some interesting results. You usually end up with more than one solution to the system. Sometimes more than one solution means that there s more than one answer. Often, though, it means that one of the answers fits the situation and the other is just extraneous — it satisfies the system of equations, but it doesn t really have any meaning in the practical problem. 

The functions ty have been defined in Eq. (15), they are found for given values 6a and 0B by solving system of equations for equilibrium distribution of species (Appendix A). Inserting expressions (19) and (20) into (18), one obtains ... 

Computers know no chemistry. They will dutifully find solutions to the equations that you write based on the initial estimates that you give. If you make errors in the equations, software applications can sometimes flag errors based on certain mathematical constraints, but they will not find errors in the chemistry. If a program does not find a solution to a set of equations, it is often because of faulty initial estimates. Always be skeptical of computer results and respectful of software limitations. Used wisely, computer applications can be a marvelous aid in your study of chemical equilibria. For examples of the use of Excel in solving systems of equations such as those found in this chapter, see Chapter 6 of Applications of Microsoft Excel in Analytical Chemistry. 

Newton s method for solving systems of equations is summarized in Algorithm C.2 and has been used elsewhere in this book for solving mass and energy transport problems. For solving the modified MESH equations we may identify the vector of variables (x) as... 

To ascertain the details of the changes represented by ii [Pg.230]

Solver is an Excel add-in that allows the user to iteratively solve systems of equations. Unfortunately, it is not installed by default on most computers. 

---