Solvent maximum contaminant level

Actually, the successful use of cationic surfactants (cSurf), as flotation reagents, frothers, metal corrosion inhibitors, pharmaceutical products, cosmetic materials, stimulates considerable increase in their production and as a result increases their content in natural water. As cationic surfactants are toxic pollutants in natural water and their maximum contaminant level (MCL) of natural water is 0.15-4.0 mg/dm, it is necessary to use methods for which provide rapid and reliable determination with sensitivity equal to at least 0.1 of MCL. Practically most sensitive methods of cationic surfactant determination include the preconcentration by extraction or sorption. Analytical methods without using organic solvents are more preferable due to their ecological safety. 

The laboratories need validated methods for performing a variety of required characteristics, e.g. robust against possible matrix interferences or matrix changes (e.g., hardness), specific and selective for the eontaminant of interest, suitable woik-ing range, applicable for the control of a maximum contaminant level. Additional desirable characteristics are that the methods should, for example, allow simplified sample preparation, rapid analyses, economical benefits, avoidanee of hazardous reagents (e.g., certain solvents), robust apparatus, compatible with the requirements of an analytical quality control (AQC) system. 

Central to the type of assessment is a definition of an environmentally acceptable concentration of each contaminant. These acceptable levels were defined as Maximum Permissible Concentrations (MPC), and were based on the toxicological assessments of solvents in drinking water by George and Siegel. These MPC levels (Table 17.2.1) are not the same levels as the current Maximum Contaminant Levels (MCL) that were promulgated by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency for drinking water. 

Contamination levels in vapor-generating sumps in excess of the recommended maximum of 25% (Table 5) can result in added difficulties such as solvent breakdown, insufficient vapor generation, and heat-element sludging. Auxiliary stills are employed frequently in conjunction with degreasers to maintain low contamination levels in the degreaser compartments. 

Control had been established with no further hazard likely, although a state of emergency was still considered to exist. Office areas immediately adjacent (40 ft) to the process area were cleared (T-t-1 day) by health physics for occupancy. Contamination was cbi ined to the process area by uranium and fission products with maximum penetrating radiation levels of SO R. There was no evidence that uranium or fission products had been deposited off site. The radioactive materials ivere contained primarily within the plant building and were concentrated in the Immediate vicinity of the reacting vessel (the solvent extraction area). 

---