Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Simulation Hartree-Fock

On the basis of the optimized ground-slate geometries, we simulate the absorption speetra by combining the scmicmpirical Hartree-Fock Intermediate Neglect of Differential Overlap (INDO) Hamiltonian to a Single Configuration Interaction... [Pg.372]

The QM/MM and ab initio methodologies have just begun to be applied to challenging problems involving ion channels [73] and proton motion through them [74]. Reference [73] utilizes Hartree-Fock and DFT calculations on the KcsA channel to illustrate that classical force fields can fail to include polarization effects properly due to the interaction of ions with the protein, and protein residues with each other. Reference [74] employs a QM/MM technique developed in conjunction with Car-Parrinello ab initio simulations [75] to model proton and hydroxide ion motion in aquaporins. Due to the large system size, the time scale for these simulations was relatively short (lOps), but the influences of key residues and macrodipoles on the short time motions of the ions could be examined. [Pg.417]

G. C. Lie and E. Clementi, Study of the structure of molecular complexes XII Structure of liquid water obtained by Monte Carlo simulation with the Hartree-Fock potential corrected by inclusion of dispersion forces, J. Chem. Phys. 62 2195 (1975). [Pg.115]

In this article, we present an ab initio approach, suitable for condensed phase simulations, that combines Hartree-Fock molecular orbital theory and modem valence bond theory which is termed as MOVB to describe the potential energy surface (PES) for reactive systems. We first provide a briefreview of the block-localized wave function (BLW) method that is used to define diabatic electronic states. Then, the MOVB model is presented in association with combined QM/MM simulations. The method is demonstrated by model proton transfer reactions in the gas phase and solution as well as a model Sn2 reaction in water. [Pg.249]

The electronic coupling of donor and acceptor sites, connected via a t-stack, can either be treated by carrying out a calculation on the complete system or by employing a divide-and-conquer (DC) strategy. With the Hartree-Fock (HF) method or a method based on density functional theory (DFT), full treatment of a d-a system is feasible for relatively small systems. Whereas such calculations can be performed for models consisting of up to about ten WCPs, they are essentially inaccessible even for dimers when one attempts to combine them with MD simulations. Semiempirical quantum chemical methods require considerably less effort than HF or DFT methods also, one can afford application to larger models. However, standard semiempirical methods, e.g., AMI or PM3, considerably underestimate the electronic couplings between r-stacked donor and acceptor sites and, therefore, a special parameterization has to be invoked (see below). [Pg.46]

A theoretical justification of the scaling procedure was given by Pupyshev et al [14]. They compared the force field Fhf obtained in the Hartree-Fock (HF) limit with the force-field Fa obtained in the configuration interaction (Cl) technique, where the electron correlation effects are taken into account by mixing the HF ground state function with electronic excitations from the occupied one-electron HF states to the virtual (unoccupied) HF states. It was assumed that the force constants F01 obtained in the Cl approximation simulate the exact harmonic force field while those, extracted from the HF approximation FHF cast the quantum-mechanical force field F1-"1. It was demonstrated that under conditions listed below ... [Pg.344]

Computational costs of IET are much lower than that of standard molecular simulations. This is crucial when considering the combination of IET and the time consuming, highly sophisticated post-Hartree-Fock ab initio theory. The QM/MM method requires much computational power because the quantum chemical calculation must be repeated many times. [Pg.596]


See other pages where Simulation Hartree-Fock is mentioned: [Pg.210]    [Pg.210]    [Pg.438]    [Pg.632]    [Pg.368]    [Pg.108]    [Pg.269]    [Pg.79]    [Pg.240]    [Pg.241]    [Pg.110]    [Pg.84]    [Pg.174]    [Pg.100]    [Pg.717]    [Pg.271]    [Pg.148]    [Pg.184]    [Pg.77]    [Pg.373]    [Pg.155]    [Pg.193]    [Pg.213]    [Pg.339]    [Pg.4]    [Pg.100]    [Pg.146]    [Pg.168]    [Pg.178]    [Pg.255]    [Pg.229]    [Pg.549]    [Pg.3]    [Pg.123]    [Pg.349]    [Pg.255]    [Pg.266]    [Pg.243]    [Pg.114]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.93 , Pg.95 , Pg.96 , Pg.97 , Pg.98 , Pg.99 , Pg.100 , Pg.101 , Pg.102 , Pg.103 , Pg.106 ]




SEARCH



Hartree Fock molecular system simulations

Hartree-Fock-Slater simulation

© 2024 chempedia.info