Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Separation distance delta function

Fig. 8. Generation of the form of the helical diffraction pattern. (A) shows that a continuous helical wire can be considered as a convolution of one turn of the helix and a set of points (actually three-dimensional delta-functions) aligned along the helix axis and separated axially by the pitch P. (B) shows that a discontinuous helix (i.e., a helical array of subunits) can be thought of as a product of the continuous helix in (A) and a set of horizontal density planes spaced h apart, where h is the subunit axial translation as in Fig. 7. This discontinuous set of points can then be convoluted with an atom (or a more complicated motif) to give a helical polymer. (C)-(F) represent helical objects and their computed diffraction patterns. (C) is half a turn of a helical wire. Its transform is a cross of intensity (high intensity is shown as white). (D) A full turn gives a similar cross with some substructure. A continuous helical wire has the transform of a complete helical turn, multiplied by the transform of the array of points in the middle of (A), namely, a set of planes of intensity a distance n/P apart (see Fig. 7). This means that in the transform in (E) the helix cross in (D) is only seen on the intensity planes, which are n/P apart. (F) shows the effect of making the helix in (E) discontinuous. The broken helix cross in (E) is now convoluted with the transform of the set of planes in (B), which are h apart. This transform is a set of points along the meridian of the diffraction pattern and separated by m/h. The resulting transform in (F) is therefore a series of helix crosses as in (E) but placed with their centers at the positions m/h from the pattern center. (Transforms calculated using MusLabel or FIELIX.)... Fig. 8. Generation of the form of the helical diffraction pattern. (A) shows that a continuous helical wire can be considered as a convolution of one turn of the helix and a set of points (actually three-dimensional delta-functions) aligned along the helix axis and separated axially by the pitch P. (B) shows that a discontinuous helix (i.e., a helical array of subunits) can be thought of as a product of the continuous helix in (A) and a set of horizontal density planes spaced h apart, where h is the subunit axial translation as in Fig. 7. This discontinuous set of points can then be convoluted with an atom (or a more complicated motif) to give a helical polymer. (C)-(F) represent helical objects and their computed diffraction patterns. (C) is half a turn of a helical wire. Its transform is a cross of intensity (high intensity is shown as white). (D) A full turn gives a similar cross with some substructure. A continuous helical wire has the transform of a complete helical turn, multiplied by the transform of the array of points in the middle of (A), namely, a set of planes of intensity a distance n/P apart (see Fig. 7). This means that in the transform in (E) the helix cross in (D) is only seen on the intensity planes, which are n/P apart. (F) shows the effect of making the helix in (E) discontinuous. The broken helix cross in (E) is now convoluted with the transform of the set of planes in (B), which are h apart. This transform is a set of points along the meridian of the diffraction pattern and separated by m/h. The resulting transform in (F) is therefore a series of helix crosses as in (E) but placed with their centers at the positions m/h from the pattern center. (Transforms calculated using MusLabel or FIELIX.)...
On the right-hand side are some delta functions. These simply show that the species A and B where both formed at time t = 0, A at rA and B at rB°. It is a source term and unless t = 0, rA — Ta , and rs = rB , it is zero. Before either pair is formed t <0), n = 0, but just after f = 0, the probability that A and B exist, /drA/dren, is 1. Note also that JdrA/drB5(rA — rA°)5(rB rB°) = 1. Now eqn. (197) is of little use as it is, because both A and B could both be in London, on the moon or anywhere else The exact location is of little interest. The relative positions of A and B is of considerable interest, because when they are separated by a distance re — rA = i , they can react. The relative position of B from A is r = Tb — Ta-... [Pg.257]

The departure of K from a delta function introduces an amount of uncertainty in the reconstruction of an object through its image. This is indicated by the fact that two point sources are seen through an optical instrument as clearly separate only if their distance is larger than... [Pg.241]

Figure 7 plots the surface pressure as a function of the separation H between two paralleled slit wall filled with one-component HS duid. The external potential for the confined HS fluid is zero if 0 < zsurface pressure, i.e., can be calculated from the integration of one-body density distribution multiplying the external force over the distance ar. In the circumstance of hard-waU, the external force recovers to a Dirac delta function and thus the surface pressure is directly related to the fluid contact density p z = 0). The predicted results from MFMT and original FMT are compared with simulation results. This comparison shows that FMT, especially the modified version, can yield very accurate results. [Pg.23]

Another function used to obtain structure information is the one-dimensional interface distribution function, g(x) (18,19). This is simply the second derivative of fee onedimensional correlation Action, or g(x) = y"(x). This function gives the probability that two interfaces will be separated by a distance, x. In an ideal two-phase system, the phases would have constant d and L throughout fee scattering volume. The interfece distribution function would be a series of delta functions. Real polymo systems have a spread cf values of d and L. This causes g(x) to be a smooth curve wife broad peaks located at d, L-d, L, L+d, etc. The peak locations and feeir breadths can be analyzed, and it has been shown(18) that g(x) provides a more reliable estimation cf d and L than Y(x), when the material contains broad distributions of thicknesses. [Pg.18]

It should be emphasized that the localized A-B bond dipole is not simply equal to the product Q QuRpc of the atomic natural charges and their separation distance. This all-too-common assumption is valid only for isolated point charges (delta-function distributions), and is particularly unrealistic for A-H hydride bonds. It is therefore fundamentally incorrect to assess an atomic charge on the basis of whether it supports this fallacious assumption. NPA is inherently consistent with molecular and bond dipole moments, when the latter are properly evaluated as integrals over the dipole moment operator. [Pg.1806]

To find the wave functions for an electron moving in one dimension, in the presence of two delta wells separated by the distance R(Fig. 5.10), write Schrodinger s equation. When written in atomic units,t it is... [Pg.49]


See other pages where Separation distance delta function is mentioned: [Pg.269]    [Pg.289]    [Pg.84]    [Pg.136]    [Pg.223]    [Pg.239]    [Pg.257]    [Pg.78]    [Pg.480]    [Pg.115]    [Pg.136]    [Pg.223]    [Pg.239]    [Pg.294]    [Pg.340]    [Pg.301]    [Pg.407]    [Pg.437]    [Pg.61]    [Pg.95]    [Pg.291]    [Pg.2828]    [Pg.150]    [Pg.851]    [Pg.276]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.215 ]




SEARCH



Delta

Delta function

Separation distances

Separation functions

Separators function

© 2024 chempedia.info