Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Scaling computational cost/expense

The success of Primal-Dual interior-point methods is due to its feature of computing reliable and highly precise solutions in a guaranteed time framework, although its computational cost can become prohibitively expensive for large-scale SDP problems. [Pg.115]

The most expensive part of a simulation of a system with explicit solvent is the computation of the long-range interactions because this scales as Consequently, a model that represents the solvent properties implicitly will considerably reduce the number of degrees of freedom of the system and thus also the computational cost. A variety of implicit water models has been developed for molecular simulations [56-60]. Explicit solvent can be replaced by a dipole-lattice model representation [60] or a continuum Poisson-Boltzmann approach [61], or less accurately, by a generalised Bom (GB) method [62] or semi-empirical model based on solvent accessible surface area [59]. Thermodynamic properties can often be well represented by such models, but dynamic properties suffer from the implicit representation. The molecular nature of the first hydration shell is important for some systems, and consequently, mixed models have been proposed, in which the solute is immersed in an explicit solvent sphere or shell surrounded by an implicit solvent continuum. A boundary potential is added that takes into account the influence of the van der Waals and the electrostatic interactions [63-67]. [Pg.873]

Second-order Moller-Plesset perturbation theory (MP2) is the computationally least expensive and most popular ab initio electron correlation method [4,15]. Except for transition metal compounds, MP2 equilibrium geometries are of comparable accuracy to DFT. However, MP2 captures long-range correlation effects (like dispersion) which are lacking in present-day density functionals. The computational cost of MP2 calculations is dominated by the integral transformation from the atomic orbital (AO) to the molecular orbital (MO) basis which scales as 0(N5) with the system size. This four-index transformation can be avoided by introduction of the RI integral approximation which requires just the transformation of three-index quantities and reduces the prefactor without significant loss in accuracy [36,37]. This makes RI-MP2 the most efficient alternative for small- to medium-sized molecular systems for which DFT fails. [Pg.31]

To investigate the scaling of the computation cost of QMBPT2, it is advantageous to use the orbital labeling instead of the composite label K in Eq. (19). For a small CAS problem the most expensive terms contain four inactive indices. [Pg.246]


See other pages where Scaling computational cost/expense is mentioned: [Pg.111]    [Pg.121]    [Pg.280]    [Pg.165]    [Pg.461]    [Pg.165]    [Pg.130]    [Pg.151]    [Pg.61]    [Pg.101]    [Pg.176]    [Pg.174]    [Pg.102]    [Pg.261]    [Pg.112]    [Pg.278]    [Pg.237]    [Pg.130]    [Pg.189]    [Pg.147]    [Pg.147]    [Pg.112]    [Pg.80]    [Pg.45]    [Pg.232]    [Pg.44]    [Pg.2414]    [Pg.253]    [Pg.250]    [Pg.23]    [Pg.53]    [Pg.31]    [Pg.433]    [Pg.23]    [Pg.162]    [Pg.1459]    [Pg.165]    [Pg.120]    [Pg.100]    [Pg.211]    [Pg.212]    [Pg.303]    [Pg.101]    [Pg.102]    [Pg.42]    [Pg.627]    [Pg.267]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.77 , Pg.82 , Pg.132 , Pg.132 ]




SEARCH



Computational costs

Costs expenses)

© 2024 chempedia.info