Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Relationship between a and

Due to the historical generation of o and a, values from formate and acetate series two inductive parameters exist with different zeros namely methyl and hydrogen respectively. This duality is confusing as both types of inductive parameter are used extensively (the use of most others having died out). The Oj value is the most utilised inductive parameter at present and is the constant of choice when steric effects are absent. The Pavehch-Taft approach is necessary when there are steric effects. The use of a is somewhat confusing as this value can be defined using RCHjCOjEt as the reference [56] under this definition hydrogen is taken as the zero. If r for RCHj- is taken then it is possible to compare Uj with a and Eqn. 73 holds. [Pg.162]

For two substances (P.Q) each measured against a standard X, the values 5px. 6qx are known from apx, ttQx. [Pg.360]

For example, from figure 4 for the two standard substances VPDB, PDB, [Pg.360]

The difference in 5 values for two substances (P,Q) measured against a standard substance is approximately equal to 1000 times the natural logarithm of their fractionation factor (app). [Pg.360]

Instead of the fractionation factor (apQ) for two substances (P,Q), a slightly different fractional abundance (/pq) may be defined  [Pg.360]

If this is multiplied by 100, it becomes atom%, a percentage that relates the proportion of heavy isotope to the sum of the heavy and light isotopes. [Pg.360]


Once the solution for has been obtained, Eq. V-2 may be used to give n and n as a function of distance, as illustrated in Fig. V-1. Illustrative curves for the variation of with distance and concentration are shown in Fig. V-2. Furthermore, use of Eq. V-3 gives a relationship between a and yo ... [Pg.173]

Relationship between a and q. The shaded area indicates regions of stable ion motion through the quadrupolar field. [Pg.187]

Figure 2.15 Empirical relationships between (a) and Cp and (b) q and Cp (with 95% confidence limits)... Figure 2.15 Empirical relationships between (a) and Cp and (b) q and Cp (with 95% confidence limits)...
Figure 5.8. Relationship between A and boiling point for use in calculating solubility parameters. Figure 5.8. Relationship between A and boiling point for use in calculating solubility parameters.
An intcrfacial lubrication or a slippage can be considered a composition-dependent phenomenon. Therefore, we postulate a relationship between a and the weight fraction [Pg.686]

Note that no such regularity has been found for < 1, except for a rapid rise of A to infinity for extremely small values of 5r [gross88c]. The irregular behavior for < 1 is in sharp contrast to the distinct linear relationship between A and 5r for 5r > 1. The regime of smaller Sr s just might deserve a closer look. [Pg.411]

Dehydration reactions. In early studies of dehydration reactions (e.g. of CuS04 5 H20 [400]), the surfaces of large crystals of reactant were activated through the incorporation of product into surfaces by abrasion with dehydrated material. An advantage of this pretreatment was the elimination of the problems of kinetic analysis of the then little understood relationship between a and time during the acceleratory process. Such surface modification resulted in the effective initiation of reaction at all boundary surfaces and rate studies were exclusively directed towards measurement of the rate of interface advance into the bulk. [Pg.262]

Assuming a linear relationship between [a] and concentration, which is true for most cases, the optical purity is equal to the percent excess of one enantiomer over the other ... [Pg.155]

To find the relationship between A and its adjoint A we take the scalar product of Atpj and tpi)... [Pg.82]

Since the hydration energy changes with p are driven by changes of Coulombic repulsion, a linear relationship between -A, and the reciprocal distance between the charged centers may be suspected, since the Coulombic energy is proportional to the reciprocal of the distance. The quantity, p + 2, may be assumed to be approximately proportional to the distance between the charged centers. We arrive... [Pg.292]

Gallo, 1983), and how the polar effects disappear totally this result is probably fortuitous and again due to the relationship between a and Es. It must therefore be concluded that parameter scales are inadequate to describe the kinetic influence of alkyl groups in bromination and in electrophilic additions in general. [Pg.247]

B = 0 - and the other made use of the observation that in Helgeson s Table 2 there is an approximate relationship between a and B, a = -313 ( 48). These estimates are also shown in Fig. 5 and it is clear from the divergence of results above 100 C that the method is too sensitive to the values of a and B to be of use at least in this case. [Pg.668]

Let us then derive a relationship between a and Z. It follows from Equation (10.49) that... [Pg.243]

Although Thomsen s data provide a basis for illustrating this method of calculation, they imply a relationship between A// and m2 at low molalities that is probably not an accurate description of the system. A better functional relationship, which is based on more modem data, will be discussed in Chapter 19. [Pg.417]

Of course, because of the linear inverse relationship between a and tt charges, the correlation with total charges also implies the existence of individual linear correlations with (T and tt populations, namely, upheld shifts for increasing 7r-electron densities, just as in the case of aromahc hydrocarbons. The latter result also follows from Patiser-Parr-Pople calculahons of tt charge densities reported by Witanowski et al. [161]. AU of these considerahons apply equally well to the series including pyridine, 1,3-diazine, 1,4-diazine, and 1,3,5-triazine, as revealed by their spectra in DMSO soluhon [162] (Fig. 6.8). [Pg.82]

The refractive index, nD, defined as the ratio of light speed at the sodium D-line in a vacuum to that in the medium, is used in obtaining the polarizability, a, of solvent molecules. The relationship between a and nD is given by a = (3Vm/ 4 rNA)( D-l)/(wD + 2), where NA is the Avogadro constant and Vm is the molar volume.4 Solvent molecules with high a-values tend to interact easily with one another or with other polarizable solute particles by dispersion forces.5 ... [Pg.15]

Coupled wave equations are not easy to handle. It will help greatly if we can somehow find some sort of approximate relationship between a and / , which will allow us to substitute for a, say, and reduce the system to a single equation. This relationship need only apply during the first wavefront. What should we take The behaviour of this model in a CSTR suggests one such form. By analogy with the stationary-state relationship, eqn (6.50), we try the form... [Pg.308]


See other pages where Relationship between a and is mentioned: [Pg.359]    [Pg.20]    [Pg.670]    [Pg.433]    [Pg.76]    [Pg.275]    [Pg.48]    [Pg.56]    [Pg.299]    [Pg.345]    [Pg.244]    [Pg.470]    [Pg.467]    [Pg.287]    [Pg.245]    [Pg.314]    [Pg.31]    [Pg.215]    [Pg.190]    [Pg.385]    [Pg.33]    [Pg.385]    [Pg.255]    [Pg.35]    [Pg.346]    [Pg.70]    [Pg.263]    [Pg.275]    [Pg.233]    [Pg.272]   


SEARCH



A Generic Description of the Relationship between Metal-Oxygen Bond Strength and Selectivity

Relationship between concentration and fractional extent in a closed environment

Relationship between the Area of a Peak and Molecular Structure

The Relationship between Snorre A and Gullfaks

© 2024 chempedia.info