Racism antiblack

Precisely because of this impurity, this profound and inextricable historical intertwining, because of this togetherness, racism exists, not despite that fact. How else could it operate, and why else would it be, as it were, necessary It seems that even by Hall s own reckoning, such prophetic statements about the impurity of the future might be tempered. Impurity and hybridity in and of themselves, are no guaranteed challenge to the racial orders of white supremacy and antiblackness—such are their conditions of possibility. 

Second, pessimism toward the demise of white supremacy and antiblackness implies in some way a belief in or an argument for the impermeability of the Racial Divide. In fact, it does not, and for at least two reasons. First, there is no necessary relationship between the two postulates (because the Racial Divide can be permeable while white supremacy and antiblackness remain robust) and, additionally, the second claim (re the impermeability of the Racial Divide) is deeply ambiguous in its own right. That is to say, it is unclear whether this ascribed imperviousness is put forward by the authors in question as descriptive (i.e., the divide can-not be breached) or as normative (i.e., the divide should not be breached). More to the point, Stephens fails to indicate where or how those purportedly pessimistic scholars of race and racism under scrutiny actually deny... 

Calvin Hernton (1988) introduced the concept of sexual racism in his classic 1965 text. Sex and Racism in America. With it he tied then prevailing sentiments of antimiscegenation to the social structures of antiblack racism. 

---