Porous electrode theory electrochemical reaction rates

Going from planar to porous electrode introduces another length scale, the electrode thickness. In the case of a PEM fuel cell catalyst layer, the thickness lies in the range of IcL — 5-10 pm. The objective of porous electrode theory is to describe distributions of electrostatic potentials, concentrations of reactant and product species, and rates of electrochemical reactions at this scale. An accurate description of a potential distribution that accounts explicitly for the potential drop at the metal/electrolyte interface would require spatial resolution in the order of 1 A. This resolution is hardly feasible (and in most cases not necessary) in electrode modeling because of the huge disparity of length scales. The simplified description of a porous electrode as an effective medium with two continuous potential distributions for the metal and electrolyte phases appears to be a consistent and practicable option for modeling these stmctures. 

In this section we describe the equations required to simulate the electrochemical performance of porous electrodes with concentrated electrolytes. Extensions to this basic model are presented in Section 4. The basis of porous electrode theory and concentrated solution theory has been reviewed by Newman and Tiedemann [1]. In porous electrode theory, the exact positions and shapes of aU the particles and pores in the electrode are not specified. Instead, properties are averaged over a volume small with respect to the overall dimensions of the electrode but large with respect to the pore structure. The electrode is viewed as a superposition of active material, filler, and electrolyte, and these phases coexist at every point in the model. Particles of the active material generally can be treated as spheres. The electrode phase is coupled to the electrolyte phase via mass balances and via the reaction rate, which depends on the potential difference between the phases. AU phases are considered to be electrically neutral, which assumes that the volume of the double layer is smaU relative to the pore volume. Where pUcable, we also indicate boundary conditions that would be used if a Uthium foil electrode were used in place of a negative insertion electrode. 

---