Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Systematics phylogenetic

Coomans, A. (1983) General principles for the phylogenetic systematics of nematodes. In Stone, A.R., Platt, H.M. and Khalil, L.F. (eds) Concepts in Nematode Systematics. Academic Press, London, pp. 1-10. [Pg.169]

Larson, A., Weisrock, D.W. and Kozak, K. H. (2003) Phylogenetic systematics of salamanders (Amphibia Caudata), a review. In D.M. Sever (Ed.), Phytogeny and Reproductive Biology of Urodela (Amphibia). Science Publishers Inc., Enfield, New Hampshire, pp. 31-108. [Pg.220]

Brooks, D.R., Hoberg, E.P. and Weekes, P. (1991) Preliminary phylogenetic systematic analysis of the major lineages of the Eucestoda (Platyhelminthes Cercomeria). Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington 104, 651-668. [Pg.31]

Zamparo, D. and Brooks, D.R. (2003) Phylogenetic systematic assessment of the Aspidobothrea (Platyhelminthes, Neodermata, Trematoda). Zoologica Scripta 32, 83-93. [Pg.36]

Scholtz G, Richter S (1995) Phylogenetic systematics of the repatantian Decapoda (Crustacea, Malacostraca). Zool J Linn Soc 113 289-328... [Pg.173]

Hennig W (1966, republished in 1999) Phylogenetic systematics (trans Davis D, Zangerl R). University of Illinois Press, Urbana... [Pg.204]

This paper is not about parsimony or likelihood analyses of phylogenetic relationships it is also not about whether Popper s philosophy of science is good, brilliant, adequate, consistent, accurate, practical, universally applicable, or true to history — I am not qualified to make value judgments in the field of philosophy of science. Instead, this paper is about what Popper wrote and whether his philosophy applies to phylogenetic systematics. I believe... [Pg.57]

Kluge, A.G., Sophisticated falsification and research cycles consequences for differential character weighting in phylogenetic systematics, ZooL Scripta, 26, 349-360, 1997. [Pg.93]

Wiley, E.O., Phylogenetics The Theory and Practice of Phylogenetic Systematics, John Wiley Sons, New York, 1981. [Pg.95]

De Queiroz, K., The ontogenetic method for determining character polarity and its relevance to phylogenetic systematics, Syst. Zool., 34, 280-299, 1985. [Pg.122]

Donoghue, M.J. and Maddison, W.P., Polarity assessment in phylogenetic systematics a response to Meacham, Taxon, 35, 534—545, 1986. [Pg.122]

Hennig, W, Phylogenetic Systematics, University of Illinois Press, Urbana, 1966. [Pg.123]

Wagele, J.W, The theory and methodology of phylogenetic systematics is still evolving a reply to Wilson, Vie Milieu, 46, 183-184, 1996a. [Pg.125]

Wagele, J.W., Eirst principles of phylogenetic systematics, a basis for numerical methods used for morphological and molecular characters. Vie Milieu, 46, 125-138, 1996b. [Pg.125]

Bonde, N., Origin of the higher groups viewpoints of phylogenetic systematics, in Problemes Actuels de Paleontologie (Evolution des Vertebres), Vol. 1, Colloques Internationaux du Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, No. 218. CNRS, Paris, 1975, pp. 293-324. [Pg.141]

Hennig, W, Phylogenetic systematics, Annu. Rev. Entomol, 10, 97-116, 1965 (reprints in Sober 1984, 1994). [Pg.142]

McLennan, D.A. and Brooks, D.R., Phylogenetic systematics five steps to enlightenment, in Fossils, Phylogeny, and Form An Analytical Approach, Adrain, J.M., Edgecombe, G.D., and Lieberman, B.S., Eds, Kluwer Academic/Plenum, New York, 2001, pp. 7-28. [Pg.144]


See other pages where Systematics phylogenetic is mentioned: [Pg.78]    [Pg.96]    [Pg.61]    [Pg.96]    [Pg.101]    [Pg.101]    [Pg.102]    [Pg.103]    [Pg.103]    [Pg.103]    [Pg.103]    [Pg.104]    [Pg.105]    [Pg.107]    [Pg.107]    [Pg.109]    [Pg.109]    [Pg.111]    [Pg.113]    [Pg.115]    [Pg.117]    [Pg.118]    [Pg.119]    [Pg.121]    [Pg.121]    [Pg.123]    [Pg.123]    [Pg.123]    [Pg.125]    [Pg.133]    [Pg.143]   


SEARCH



Phylogenetic

Phylogenetic systematics character analysis

Phylogenetics

© 2024 chempedia.info