Photoacoustic calorimetry reliability

To illustrate an application of PAC, we chose reaction 13.22, which has been suggested as a test reaction for photoacoustic calorimetry, that is, as a procedure to assess the reliability of the instrument [285]. Wayner et al. [293] made a very careful PAC study of this reaction in several solvents. 

Historically, some of those approaches have been developed with a considerable degree of independence, leading to a proliferation of thermochemical concepts and conventions that may be difficult to grasp. Moreover, the past decades have witnessed the development of new experimental methods, in solution and in the gas phase, that have allowed the thermochemical study of neutral and ionic molecular species not amenable to the classic calorimetric and noncalorimetric techniques. Thus, even the expert reader (e.g., someone who works on thermochemistry or chemical kinetics) is often challenged by the variety of new and sophisticated methods that have enriched the literature. For example, it is not uncommon for a calorimetrist to have no idea about the reliability of mass spectrometry data quoted from a paper many gas-phase kineticists ignore the impact that photoacoustic calorimetry results may have in their own field most experimentalists are notoriously unaware of the importance of computational chemistry computational chemists often compare their results with less reliable experimental values and the consistency of thermochemical data is a frequently ignored issue and responsible for many inaccuracies in literature values. 

---