Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Peridotites oceanic mantle

The abyssal peridotites are samples from the oceanic mantle that were dredged on the ocean floor, or recovered from drill cores (e.g., Bonatti et al., 1974 Prinz et al., 1976 Hamlyn and Bonatti, 1980). [Pg.806]

In spite of their variable provenance (subcontinental lithosphere, supra-subduction mantle wedge, or oceanic mantle), most of the tectonically emplaced and abyssal peridotites show coherent covariation trends for major elements (Eigure 5). These variations reflect their variable modal compositions between a fertile end-member— comparable to proposed estimates for pristine... [Pg.822]

As noted above, isotope decouphng between oceanic mantle and crust was observed both in ophiolites (Claesson et al., 1984 Gopel et al., 1984 Jacobsen et al., 1984 Brouxel and Lapierre, 1988 Rampone et al., 1996, 1998) and in abyssal rocks (Snow et al., 1994 Kempton and Stephens, 1997 Salters and Dick, 2002). In most examples, the mantle rocks are distinguished from the oceanic crust by more depleted isotopic compositions, generally reflected by higher Nd/ Nd values. However, the interpretations proposed for the ophiolites and for the abyssal peridotites are markedly different. [Pg.858]

Boyd (1989) compiled modes of major minerals in peridotite xenoliths from on and off-craton localities and compared the results with mantle residues from oceanic mantle represented by... [Pg.886]

Figure 38 Nd-Sr isotope variation of clinopyroxenes and garnet in peridotite xenoliths. (a) Compares cratonic and noncratonic peridotite xenoliths with continental crust. Inset shows restricted field for oceanic mantle. Arrow points to a peridotite from Lashaine, Tanzania, that lies at an Sr/ Sr value of 0.83. (b) Compares cratonic peridotites from the Kaapvaal, Wyoming, and Siberian cratons. Figure 38 Nd-Sr isotope variation of clinopyroxenes and garnet in peridotite xenoliths. (a) Compares cratonic and noncratonic peridotite xenoliths with continental crust. Inset shows restricted field for oceanic mantle. Arrow points to a peridotite from Lashaine, Tanzania, that lies at an Sr/ Sr value of 0.83. (b) Compares cratonic peridotites from the Kaapvaal, Wyoming, and Siberian cratons.
Direct evidence for the compositional effects of partial melt extraction is preserved in samples of upper-mantle lithosphere with a range of ages, including Archean cratonic mantle, Proterozoic subcontinental mantle, and modern oceanic mantle. Samples of upper mantle are collected as xenoliths, peridotites dredged from oceanic fracture zones, and slices of upper mantle tectonically exposed at the surface, and extensive samples exist from both oceanic and continental settings (see Chapters 2.04 and 2.05). Here, data sets are assembled for oceanic and subcontinental mantle lithosphere, and compositional trends are compared to those predicted for partial melt extraction from fertile peridotite in order to deduce the role that melt extraction has played in producing compositional variability in upper-mantle lithosphere, and to place constraints on the thermal evolution of the mantle. [Pg.1064]

Modern oceanic mantle is defined solely by abyssal peridotites, which are samples of harzbur-gite and Iherzolite collected from fracture zones at oceanic spreading centers, and these samples are representative of shallow oceanic lithosphere that has been processed at mid-ocean ridges (see Chapter 2.04). Two types of continental mantle lithosphere are considered (i) cratonic mantle, which refers to xenoliths collected from kimberlites that sample portions of mantle beneath stable, Archean cratons and (ii) off-craton mantle, which refers to xenoliths collected from alkalic basalts that have sampled portions of the subcontinental mantle adjacent to ancient cratonic mantle (see Chapter 2.05). Also included with off-craton lithosphere are orogenic Iherzolites and ophiolites, which are slices of mantle tectonically emplaced typically at convergent margins. [Pg.1070]

Any method for reconstructing abyssal peridotite bulk compositions involves assumptions and uncertainties. Rather than choosing a single reconstruction method as superior, we consider that in total these reconstructions are highly representative of depleted oceanic mantle beneath the axis of mid-ocean ridges. [Pg.1073]

Byndzia, L.T., Wood, B.J., and Dick, H.J.B., 1989. The oxidation state of the earth s sub-oceanic mantle from oxygen thermobarometry of abyssal spinel peridotites. Nature, 341, 526-7. [Pg.249]

Mantle reservoirs. The only quasi-systematic studies of igneous materials have centered on the mantle in particular mid-ocean ridge basalts (MORE), ocean island basalts, and mantle peridotites. After reporting one MORE analysis in Chan and Edmond (1988), the first full study of MORE (Chan et al. 1992) reported three apparently imaltered Atlantic basalts and one from the East Pacific Rise, with a range in 8 Li of +3.4 to +4.7 (Fig. 5). Subsequent studies have increased the global range of samples, the diversity of bulk compositions analyzed. [Pg.160]

Figure 9. Plots of Li and radiogenic isotopes for mantle rocks, (a) 5 Li vs. Sr/ Sr (b) 5 Li vs. Nd/ Nd (c) "Sr/ Sr vs. Pb/ Pb (d) 5"Li vs. Pb/ Pb (Nishio et al. 2003, 2004). Symbols + = south Pacific island basalts (six islands) O = Iherzolite xenolith, Bullenmerri, Australia = Iherzolite xenolith, Sikhote-Alin, Russia (three localities) A = dunite-peridotite-pyroxenite xenolith, Kyushu, Japan (two localities) V = Iherzolite xenolith, Ichinomegata, Japan. The ocean island data are from bulk rocks, the xenolith data are clinopyroxene separates. For explanations of the derivation of radiogenic isotope fields (DM, EMI, EM2, HIMU), see Zindler and Hart (1986). The estimate for Li isotopes in DM is based on MORE. The Li isotopic ranges for the other mantle reservoirs are based on Nishio et al. (2004) and Nishio et al. (2003), but these will require further examination (hence the use of question marks). Figure 9. Plots of Li and radiogenic isotopes for mantle rocks, (a) 5 Li vs. Sr/ Sr (b) 5 Li vs. Nd/ Nd (c) "Sr/ Sr vs. Pb/ Pb (d) 5"Li vs. Pb/ Pb (Nishio et al. 2003, 2004). Symbols + = south Pacific island basalts (six islands) O = Iherzolite xenolith, Bullenmerri, Australia = Iherzolite xenolith, Sikhote-Alin, Russia (three localities) A = dunite-peridotite-pyroxenite xenolith, Kyushu, Japan (two localities) V = Iherzolite xenolith, Ichinomegata, Japan. The ocean island data are from bulk rocks, the xenolith data are clinopyroxene separates. For explanations of the derivation of radiogenic isotope fields (DM, EMI, EM2, HIMU), see Zindler and Hart (1986). The estimate for Li isotopes in DM is based on MORE. The Li isotopic ranges for the other mantle reservoirs are based on Nishio et al. (2004) and Nishio et al. (2003), but these will require further examination (hence the use of question marks).

See other pages where Peridotites oceanic mantle is mentioned: [Pg.145]    [Pg.749]    [Pg.819]    [Pg.854]    [Pg.927]    [Pg.1083]    [Pg.1087]    [Pg.1087]    [Pg.1088]    [Pg.1569]    [Pg.45]    [Pg.117]    [Pg.152]    [Pg.225]    [Pg.383]    [Pg.387]    [Pg.387]    [Pg.388]    [Pg.64]    [Pg.260]    [Pg.209]    [Pg.217]    [Pg.256]    [Pg.256]    [Pg.311]    [Pg.359]    [Pg.413]    [Pg.521]    [Pg.531]    [Pg.162]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.372 , Pg.373 , Pg.379 ]




SEARCH



Mantle

Oceanic mantle

Oceanic peridotites

Oceans oceanic mantle

Peridotites

Peridotites mantle

© 2024 chempedia.info