Particle measurements, aircraft sampling

Distortion of the particle size during the sampling process is a concern in the use of this probe on an aircraft. Compressional heating due to deceleration of the particles may distort the size distribution, because evaporation of water from aerosol particles reduces their diameters. Likewise, particle sizes can be reduced by use of a heater, incorporated into some models of this probe, to prevent icing when supercooled clouds are being flown through. One study (88) indicated that the probe heater removes most of the water from aerosol particles sampled at relative humidities of 95%. Thus, size distributions of aerosol particles measured with the probe heater on correspond to that of the dehydrated aerosol. These results were confirmed by a later study (90) in which size distributions of aerosols measured with a nonintrusive probe were compared to size distributions measured with a de-iced PCASP probe. Measurement of the aerosol size distribution with the probe heater on may be an advantage in certain studies. 

Figure 7-13 gives also size distributions for the concentration of sea-salt particles about 6 m above the ocean surface. They were derived by Blanchard and Woodcock (1980) from mass distributions measured by Chaen (1973) on board ships. Durbin and White (1961) and Woodcock (1972) had earlier obtained similar results by aircraft sampling at elevations between 600 and 800 m. Figure 7-13 shows that the size spectrum of sea-salt particles corresponds to that of sea-spray production, indicating that in the size range... 

The CCN behavior of ambient particles can be measured by drawing an air sample into an instrument in which the particles are subjected to a known supersaturation, a so-called CCN counter (Nenes et al. 2001). If the size distribution and chemical composition of the ambient particles are simultaneously measured, then the measured CCN behavior can be compared to that predicted by Kohler theory on the basis of their size and composition. Such a comparison can be termed a CCN closure, that is, an assessment of the extent to which measured CCN activation can be predicted theoretically [see, for example, VanReken et al. (2003), Ghan et al. (2006), and Rissman et al. (2006)]. The next level of evaluation is an aerosol-cloud drop closure, in which a cloud parcel model, which predicts cloud drop concentration using observed ambient aerosol concentration, size distribution, cloud updraft velocity, and thermodynamic state, is evaluated against direct airborne measurements of cloud droplet number concentration as a function of altitude above cloud base. The predicted activation behavior can also be evaluated by independent measurements by a CCN instrument on board the aircraft. Such an aerosol-cloud drop closure was carried out by Conant et al. (2004) for warm cumulus clouds in Florida. 

---