Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Partial debond model

Finally, the solution for the mean fiber fragmentation length, IL, which is the sum of the debonded and bonded lengths in the partial debond model, is derived from the fiber fragmentation criterion given by Eq. (4.70)... [Pg.120]

Fig. 4.6. Schematic drawing of a partially debonded single fiber composite model subject to external stress, (Ta, in the fiber fragmentation test. Fig. 4.6. Schematic drawing of a partially debonded single fiber composite model subject to external stress, (Ta, in the fiber fragmentation test.
Based on the same average fiber tensile strength model as that employed in Section 4.2.3, the fiber fragmentation criterion is derived in terms of the external stress, ffa(= (h = o er, for the partially debonded interface ... [Pg.113]

Fig. 4.16. Variation of mean fiber fragmentation length, 2L, versus applied strain, , in the partially debonded interface model for Tb = 50 MPa. After Kim et al. (1993b). Fig. 4.16. Variation of mean fiber fragmentation length, 2L, versus applied strain, , in the partially debonded interface model for Tb = 50 MPa. After Kim et al. (1993b).
To show clearly how and to what extent the parameter, Zmax. varies with the properties of the interface and the composite constituents, a simple fiber pull-out model by Karbhari and Wilkins (1990) is chosen here. This model is developed based on the assumption of a constant friction shear stress, Tfr, in the context of the shear strength criterion for interface debonding. In this model, the partial debond stress may be written as... [Pg.135]

Equation 1 assumes that the shear stress at the interface is constant as a result of complete interfacial debonding. With good adhesion, only partial debonding or other micro-mechanical events such as transverse matrix cracking are observed, which invalidate the assumption of a constant interfacial shear stress. As a result, alternative data reduction techniques have been developed. For example, Tripathi and Jones developed the cumulative stress-transfer function, which deals with the limitations given above. This has been further refined by Lopattananon et al into the stress-transfer efficiency from which an ineffective length of that fibre in that resin can be determined. In this model, the matrix properties and frictional adhesion at debonds can be included in the analysis. It is also possible to use the three-phase stress-transfer model of Wu et al to include the properties of an interphase. [Pg.174]


See other pages where Partial debond model is mentioned: [Pg.118]    [Pg.118]    [Pg.59]    [Pg.50]    [Pg.96]    [Pg.110]    [Pg.113]    [Pg.123]    [Pg.123]    [Pg.124]    [Pg.128]    [Pg.394]    [Pg.353]    [Pg.58]    [Pg.96]    [Pg.96]    [Pg.6280]    [Pg.85]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.120 ]




SEARCH



Debond

Debonding

Partial debonding

Partial model

© 2024 chempedia.info