Polarization opposition effect

The ff-t5Tpe ethoxycarbonyl radical is on the contrary less nucleophilic than the acetyl radical (Table 29) in this Ccise the unpaired electron occupies a hybrid orbital and the incipient positive charge in the transition state cannot be stabilized by the lone-pair electron of the alkoxy group, as with the alkoxyalkyl radical, so that only the inductive effect is working and a clean reduction of nucleophilicity is observed. The remarkable fact is therefore that the same substituent, an a-alkoxy group, produces opposite polar effects depending on the electronic configuration of the carbon-centered radical. 

Although we have illustrated the effects of polarizability of ions by considering a few cases where the effects are large, there must be some polarization effect for any combination of ions. However, there is an even more important consideration. It is known that the apparent radius of a given ion depends somewhat on the environment of the ion. For example, an ion surrounded by four nearest neighbors will appear to be slightly different in size from one that is surrounded by six ions of opposite charge. We have treated the ionic radius as if it were a fixed number that is the same in any type of... 

At still smaller distances, lithium becomes weakly anionic and the Li F bond ionicity again increases, but with opposite polarity (Li- 54-). This can be readily understood from the shapes of unfilled acceptor AOs. At short distances, the (2p)f orbital becomes an increasingly poor acceptor, because favorable overlap with one lobe is increasingly canceled out by unfavorable overlap with the opposite lobe, as shown in Fig. 2.6(b). Under these circumstances, the unfilled (2s)n orbital becomes the best available acceptor orbital, and electron flow is actually reversed toward Li. However, these changes occur far inside the repulsive inner wall of the potential, so their effects will not be considered further here. 

Crowley also well illustrates the opposite polarity. There is a point at which the iaded horse no longer answers whip and spur [cocaine]. He stumbles, falls a quivering heap, and gasps out his life. So perishes the slave of cocaine," In a further passage he describes the demons (hallucinations) produced by prolonged cocaine use and the drug s effect on the mind which enables the user to completely rationalize their existence. 

The DPs obtained in cationic polymerizations are affected not only by the direct effect of the polarity of the solvent on the rate constants, but also by its effect on the degree of dissociation of the ion-pairs and, hence, on the relative abundance of free ions and ion-pairs, and thus the relative importance of unimolecular and bimolecular chain-breaking reactions between ions of opposite charge (see Section 6). Furthermore, in addition to polarity effects the chain-transfer activity of alkyl halide and aromatic solvents has a quite distinct effect on the DP. The smaller the propagation rate constant, the more important will these effects be. 

The decrease in hydrogenation rate with increasing size of the alkyl group (Table VI) (93-96) can be correlated by the Taft equation. However, the correlation of the data by Smith and Pennekamp (93) (series 70) using the polar parameter Taft equation is applied that also includes steric constants. Similarly, Kieboom (34) has discussed Yoshida s correlation of series 73 based on main conclusion has been that the data do not allow a clear distinction between steric and polar effects. It seems that both operate in the same direction. Series 72 and 73, in which the rate data have been separated into the rate constants and adsorption coefficients, show opposite trends with the latter parameter. A similar problem has been encountered by Volter, Hermann, and Heise (100) and by Najemnik and Zdrazil (103) in the series of methylbenzenes (Table VII) and is discussed in this connection. 

The bipolar pulse technique for measuring solution resistance minimizes the effects of both the series and parallel cell capacitances in a unique way. The instrumentation for this technique is illustrated in Figure 8.15. The technique consists of applying two consecutive voltage pulses of equal magnitude and pulse width but of opposite polarity to a cell and then measuring the cell current precisely at the end of the second pulse [18]. 

---