Nuclear energy decrease

First, Americans do not want to abandon nuclear energy. When a nationwide sample of Americans were asked whether the current utilization of nuclear energy in the United States should be decreased kept the same, or increased, about 43% wanted to keep it the same and around 30% wanted to increase it. Approximately 27% wanted to decrease reliance on nuclear energy. 

The height of the potential barrier separating the initial and final states of the nuclear subsystem decreases and, hence, the Franck-Condon factor increases (Fig. 6). In the classical limit, this results in a decrease of the activation free energy. 

Thus classically the potential energy gets more negative (more favorable) as the nuclear separation decreases. In fact, three charged balls would collapse together, and the bond length would be comparable to the diameter of the proton—about five orders of magnitude smaller than the experimentally measurable separation of 106 picometers. 

The following concept is to carry out, effectively by utilising nuclear energy, the so-called carbon minus or negative emission , which not only reduces C02 emission to the atmosphere but also removes C02 from the atmosphere, thus to restore the global environment by decreasing the atmospheric C02 concentration. 

In this process, nuclear energy can effectively be utilised, avoiding the C02 emission from any biomass or fossil combustion. Thus, a significant amount of C02 can efficiently be removed from the atmosphere by processing a part of annual growth of biomass, which leads to the decrease of atmospheric C02 concentration. 

---