Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Mucosal extraction ratio

Figure 2 Simulation of the effect of enzyme induction on oral midazolam AUC. Hepatic extraction in the absence of an inducer was set at 0.44. The initial intestinal extraction was varied from 0.0 to 0.9. The inducer was assumed to cause an equivalent change in hepatic and intestinal intrinsic clearance. Mucosal and hepatic plasma flows were assumed to be 240 and 780 mL/min. Simulations were obtained from Eq. (6), assuming an initial intestinal extraction ratio of 0.00, 0.07, 0.27, 0.43, 0.60, and 0.88. Figure 2 Simulation of the effect of enzyme induction on oral midazolam AUC. Hepatic extraction in the absence of an inducer was set at 0.44. The initial intestinal extraction was varied from 0.0 to 0.9. The inducer was assumed to cause an equivalent change in hepatic and intestinal intrinsic clearance. Mucosal and hepatic plasma flows were assumed to be 240 and 780 mL/min. Simulations were obtained from Eq. (6), assuming an initial intestinal extraction ratio of 0.00, 0.07, 0.27, 0.43, 0.60, and 0.88.

See other pages where Mucosal extraction ratio is mentioned: [Pg.475]    [Pg.477]    [Pg.475]    [Pg.477]    [Pg.62]    [Pg.242]    [Pg.42]    [Pg.270]    [Pg.111]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.475 , Pg.477 ]




SEARCH



Extraction ratio,

Mucosal

Mucositis

Ratios extractants

© 2024 chempedia.info