MP2

Figure B3.1.9 [83] displays the errors (in pieometres eompared to experimental findings) in the equilibrium bond lengths for a series of 28 moleeules obtained at the FIF, MP2-4, CCSD, CCSD(T), and CISD levels of theory using three polarized eorrelation-eonsistent basis sets (valenee DZ tlu-ough to QZ).

Clearly, the HF method, independent of basis, systematically underestimates the bond lengdis over a broad percentage range. The CISD method is neither systematic nor narrowly distributed in its errors, but the MP2 and MP4 (but not MP3) methods are reasonably accurate and have narrow error distributions if valence TZ or QZ bases are used. The CCSD(T), but not the CCSD, method can be quite reliable if valence TZ or QZ bases are used. 

Figure Cl. 1.7. MP2/6-311 + G optimized stmctures of the Si O (y = 1-6) clusters. All bond lengths are in A. Note that for y = 1-4, all the O atoms are bridge bonded to two Si. Wang L S, Nicholas J B, Dupuis M, Wu H and Colson S D 1997 Phys. Rev. Lett. 78 4450, figure 2.

Xantheas S S 1995 Ah initio studies of oyeiio water oiusters (H20), n = 1-6. iii. Comparison of density funotionai with MP2 resuits J. Chem. Phys. 102 4505... 

HypcrChcrn sup )orLs MP2 (second order Mollcr-Plessct) correlation cn crgy calculation s tisin g ah initio rn cth ods with an y ava liable basis set. In order lo save mam memory and disk space, the Hyper-Chern MP2 electron correlation calculation normally uses a so called frozen -core" appro.xiniatioii, i.e. the in n er sh ell (core) orbitals are om it ted,. A sett in g in CHKM. INI allows excitation s from the core orbitals lo be included if necessary (melted core). Only the single poin t calcii lation is available for this option. ... 

MP2 correlation energy calculations may increase the computational lime because a tw o-electron integral Iran sfonnalion from atomic orbitals (.40 s) to molecular orbitals (MO s) is ret]uired. HyperClicrn rnayalso need additional main memory arul/orcxtra disk space to store the two-eleetron integrals of the MO s. 

The Raffenelti format is not available w-lieii performing MP2 and Cl calcu lation s. 

The amount of computation for MP2 is determined by the partial tran si ormatioii of the two-electron integrals, what can be done in a time proportionally to m (m is the u umber of basis functions), which IS comparable to computations involved m one step of(iID (doubly-excitcil eon figuration interaction) calculation. fo save some computer time and space, the core orbitals are frequently omitted from MP calculations. For more details on perturbation theory please see A. S/abo and N. Ostlund, Modem Quantum (. hern-isir > Macmillan, Xew York, 198.5. 

To obtain an improvement on the Hartree-Fock energy it is therefore necessary to use Moller-Plesset perturbation theory to at least second order. This level of theory is referred to as MP2 and involves the integral J dr. The higher-order wavefunction g is... 

A very important difference between H2 and molecular orbital calculations is electron correlation. Election correlation is the term used to describe interactions between elections in the same molecule. In the hydrogen molecule ion, there is only one election, so there can be no election correlation. The designators given to the calculations in Table 10-1 indicate first an electron correlation method and second a basis set, for example, MP2/6-31 G(d,p) designates a Moeller-Plesset electron coiTclation extension beyond the Hartiee-Fock limit canied out with a 6-31G(d,p) basis set. 

GAUSSIAN implementation with the result found using MP2/6-31G in the route section. 

Corrections to the MP4/6-311G(d,b) Energy. Higher-level basis functions, if they are prudently chosen, should be better than lower-level functions. Thus the energy of, for example, a diffuse function, [MP2/6-311 - - G(d,p)] should be lower (more negative) than the same function in which diffuse electron density is not taken into account [MP2/6-31 lG(d,p)], provided that the levels of elecUon... 

---