Molecular structure orbital overlap

As a consequence of the molecular orbital interactions, ferrocene adopts an axially symmetrical sandwich structure with two parallel Cp ligands with a distance of 3.32 A (eclipsed conformation) and ten identical Fe-C distances of 2.06 A as well as ten identical C-C distances of 1.43 A [12]. Deviation of the parallel Cp arrangement results in a loss of binding energy owing to a less efficient orbital overlap [8]. All ten C-H bonds are slightly tilted toward the Fe center, as judged from neutron-diffraction studies [13]. 

In this chapter, we develop a model of bonding that can be applied to molecules as simple as H2 or as complex as chlorophyll. We begin with a description of bonding based on the idea of overlapping atomic orbitals. We then extend the model to include the molecular shapes described in Chapter 9. Next we apply the model to molecules with double and triple bonds. Then we present variations on the orbital overlap model that encompass electrons distributed across three, four, or more atoms, including the extended systems of molecules such as chlorophyll. Finally, we show how to generalize the model to describe the electronic structures of metals and semiconductors. 

Triatomic species can be linear, like CO2, or bent, like O3. The principles of orbital overlap do not depend on the identity of the atoms involved, so all second-row triatomic species with 16 valence electrons have the same bonding scheme as CO2 and are linear. For example, dinitrogen oxide (N2 O) has 16 valence electrons, so it has an orbital configuration identical to that of CO2. Each molecule is linear with an inner atom whose steric number is 2. As in CO2, the bonding framework of N2 O can be represented with sp hybrid orbitals. Both molecules have two perpendicular sets of three tt molecular orbitals. The resonance structures of N2 O, described... 

The electronic structures of the hetero- and homobimetallic triple-deckers 11 and 12 were investigated by photoelectron spectroscopy and intermediate neglect of differential overlap (INDO) molecular orbital (MO) calculations, which revealed that the metal-borole interaction is stronger in the dimanganese system 12 than in 11, owing to better Mn-borole versus Co-borole orbital overlap.12... 

Other simplified quantum treatments, such as the Lewis electron pair and orbital overlap models, have proved useful in teaching and they give qualitative predictions of the structures of molecular compounds, but they become unwieldy when applied to solids. They have not proved to be particularly helpful in the description of the complex structures found in inorganic chemistry and have therefore not been widely used in this field. 

---