Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Molecular potential extended Hartree-Fock

The molecule is often represented as a polarizable point dipole. A few attempts have been performed with finite size models, such as dielectric spheres [64], To the best of our knowledge, the first model that joined a quantum mechanical description of the molecule with a continuum description of the metal was that by Hilton and Oxtoby [72], They considered an hydrogen atom in front of a perfect conductor plate, and they calculated the static polarizability aeff to demonstrate that the effect of the image potential on aeff could not justify SERS enhancement. In recent years, PCM has been extended to systems composed of a molecule, a metal specimen and possibly a solvent or a matrix embedding the metal-molecule system in a molecularly shaped cavity [62,73-78], In particular, the molecule was treated at the Hartree-Fock, DFT or ZINDO level, while for the metal different models have been explored for SERS and luminescence calculations, metal aggregates composed of several spherical particles, characterized by the experimental frequency-dependent dielectric constant. For luminescence, the effects of the surface roughness and the nonlocal response of the metal (at the Lindhard level) for planar metal surfaces have been also explored. The calculation of static and dynamic electrostatic interactions between the molecule, the complex shaped metal body and the solvent or matrix was done by using a BEM coupled, in some versions of the model, with an IEF approach. [Pg.309]

The extension of the basis can improve wave functions and energies up to the Hartree-Fock limit, that is, a sufficiently extended basis can circumvent the LCAO approximation and lead to the best molecular orbitals for ground states. However, this is still in the realm of the independent-particle approximation 175>, and the use of single Slater-determinant wave functions in the study of potential surfaces implies the assumption that correlation energy remains approximately constant on that part of the surface where reaction pathways develop. In cases when this assumption cannot be accepted, extensive configuration interaction (Cl) must be included. A detailed comparison of SCF and Cl results is available for the potential energy surface for the reaction F + H2-FH+H 47 ). [Pg.36]

Figure 1 Electrostatic potentials on the molecular surfaces of (a) cytosine, 1, and (b) guanine, 2, computed at the Hartree-Fock 6-31G level. Color ranges, in kcal/mol red, more positive than 17 blue, more negative than —20 (see legend). The relative positions of the molecules are such that the portions that hydrogen bond are facing each other, showing how the extended positive and negative regions will interact. (See color plate at end of chapter.)... Figure 1 Electrostatic potentials on the molecular surfaces of (a) cytosine, 1, and (b) guanine, 2, computed at the Hartree-Fock 6-31G level. Color ranges, in kcal/mol red, more positive than 17 blue, more negative than —20 (see legend). The relative positions of the molecules are such that the portions that hydrogen bond are facing each other, showing how the extended positive and negative regions will interact. (See color plate at end of chapter.)...
Information on even specialized scientific topics can often be obtained from ordinary search engines. For example, a popular search engine gave information (ten hits for each) on these five topics, using the keywords shown Hartree Fock, potential energy surface, molecular mechanics, Huckel, Extended Huckel. In several cases the hypertext leads one to tutorials, and to free programs. [Pg.457]

While the relativistically parameterised extended Hiickel approach to the calculation of molecular parity violating effects has the merit of simplicity, it suffers in particular from the non-self-consistent character of the extended Hiickel method. This problem is avoided in the four-component Dirac Hartree-Fock approaches to the computation of parity violating potentials in chiral molecules introduced by Quiney, Skaane and Grant [155] as well as Laerdahl and Schwerdtfeger [156]. These will be described in the following section. [Pg.248]

The expression for the lowest order contribution to the parity violating potential within the Dirac Hartree-Fock framework is identical to that within the relativistically parameterised extended Hiickel approach in eq. (146). The difference is, however, that in DHF typically atomic basis sets with fixed radial functions are employed (see [161]) and that the molecular orbital coefficients are obtained in a self-consistent Dirac Hartree-Fock procedure. Computations of parity violating potentials along these lines have occasionally been called fully relativistic, although this term is rather unfortunate. In the four-component Dirac Hartree-Fock calculations by Quiney, Skaane and Grant [155] as well as in those by Schwerdtfeger, Laerdahl and coworkers [65,156,162,163] the Dirac-Coulomb operator has been employed, which is for systems with n electrons given by... [Pg.248]


See other pages where Molecular potential extended Hartree-Fock is mentioned: [Pg.150]    [Pg.402]    [Pg.148]    [Pg.49]    [Pg.112]    [Pg.154]    [Pg.137]    [Pg.403]    [Pg.496]    [Pg.576]    [Pg.15]    [Pg.54]    [Pg.161]    [Pg.154]    [Pg.61]    [Pg.77]    [Pg.3]    [Pg.216]    [Pg.252]    [Pg.8]    [Pg.30]    [Pg.166]    [Pg.137]    [Pg.282]    [Pg.147]    [Pg.130]    [Pg.467]    [Pg.54]    [Pg.649]    [Pg.685]    [Pg.120]    [Pg.48]    [Pg.120]    [Pg.109]    [Pg.567]    [Pg.737]    [Pg.140]    [Pg.80]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.280 ]




SEARCH



Fock potential

Hartree potential

Hartree-Fock extended

Hartree-Fock potential

Molecular potential

© 2024 chempedia.info