Methyl groups additivity rules

Addition of metalated, enantiomerically pure a-sulfinyl dimethylhydrazones (e.g., 9) to racemic a-chiral aldehydes 10 proceeds with good to excellent diastereo- and enantioselectivi-ty12. Diastereomeric ratios increase with increasing steric demand of the acetaldehyde substituent R1 compared to the methyl group, and each diastereomer is obtained with high enantiomeric excess. In the aldol-lype addition to 2-phenylpropanal, one of the four possible stereoisomers is formed selectively. The relative (syn) and absolute (R.R) configuration is in accord with Cram s and related rules as well as H-NMR data of closely related compounds. 

The addition of lithium dimethyl-, dibutyl-, diphenyl- or 1-butenylcuprate to 2d produced (JiS) 94% ee, ifiS) 95% ee, (jiR) 96% ec, and ifiR) 90% ee, respectively. In this case the difference between S and R results from the CIP selection rules and not to the steric course of the reactions. The conformation of the chiral auxiliary in 1 d is such that one IV-methyl group is axially, the other equatorially, arranged on the bicyclic structure. The reagents attack the double bond from the side opposite to the equatorial iV-methyl group. Other chiral auxiliaries such as a-c14 were less effective15. 

S-adenosyl-L methionine (ADO-Met) dependent DNA methyl transferase catalyzed the transfer of a methyl group from AdoMet to a specific nucleotide within the DNA helix (Cheng et al., 1993). In a concerted reaction in the enzyme active site (Fig X) with a simultaneous addition of methyl residue of AdoMet to the cytosine ring and with an elimination of the ring proton by a water molecule requires involving seven heavy nuclei (two ofCys 81, four of AdoMet and one of water. An estimation with aid of Eq. 2.44 leads to value of the reaction synchronization factor asyn 10 4, that does not rule out the concerted mechanism, if the activation energy is less than 10 kcal/mole Nevertheless, a... 

The "five atom rule," first suggested by Alles and Knoefel (38) and stated more formally by Ing (39), proposesthat, for maximum muscarinic activity, there should be attached to the quaternary nitrogen atom, in addition to three methyl groups, a fourth group with a chain of five atoms, as illustrated for acetylcholine C-C-O-C-C-N. This empirical observation has been found to be valid for a large number of molecules, regardless of the precise nature of the five atoms involved. 

Since both isomers 2 and 5 are trans-decalins, an additional criterion of identity is the order of elution. The effect of a methyl group to increase retention times of the monomethyldecalins (see Table XXIV) is in the order eqiiatorial-2 (20.4), eqtuitorial-1 (22.5), axial-2 (23.6), and axial-1 (27.3). In isomer 2, the methyls are equatorial-l, axial-2 (22.6 + 23.6 = 46.1) in isomer 6, they are axial-l, equatorial-2 (27.3 + 20.4 = 47.7). Thus isomer 2 would be expected to be eluted faster than isomer 5. Where there is a difference in conformational energy, the dimethyl conformational energies. In the 10 sets, comprising all 34 dimethyl-irana-decalins, there is only one exception to this rule. 

Some chemical structures exhibit typical distances that occur independently of secondary features, which mainly affect the intensity distribution. In particular, aromatic systems contain at least a distance pattern of ortho-, meta-, and para-carbon atoms in the aromatic ring. A monocyclic aromatic system shows additionally a typical frequency distribution. Consequently, Cartesian RDF descriptors for benzene, toluene, and xylene isomers show a typical pattern for the three C-C distances of ortho-, meta-, and para-position (1.4, 2.4, and 2.8 A, respectively) within a benzene ring. This pattern is unique and indicates a benzene ring. Additional patterns occur for the substituted derivatives (3.8 and 4.3 A) that are also typical for phenyl systems. The increasing distance of the methyl groups in meta- and para-Xylene is indicated by a peak shift at 5.1 and 5.8 A, respectively. These types of patterns are primarily used in rule bases for the modeling of structures explained in detail in the application for structure prediction with infrared spectra. 

Mechanism (a) does not show the involvement of the hydroxide ion and must therefore be ruled out. Mechanism (b) invokes the removal of a proton from the methyl group of an acetaldehyde molecule by a hydroxide ion to give an unstable carbanion intermediate. This reacts with a second acetaldehyde molecule by nucleophilic addition to the carbonyl group. The resultant anion picks up a proton from a water molecule to give the 3-hydroxybutanal product, and regenerates the hydroxide anion catalyst. All three steps are concerted and involve the simultaneous breakage and formation of covalent bonds. Multi-step concerted reactions of this type are common in biological systems. 

---