Mean binding energies, AVERAGE

Until now, we have discussed the use of additivity schemes to estimate global properties of a molecule such as its mean molecular polarizability, its heat of formation, or its average binding energy to a protein receptor. 

It is quite instructive to compare these new measurements (which lie outside the data bases available at the time the various mass models were formulated) with predictions from the models. For such comparisons it is convenient to define A = Predicted Mass - Measured Mass. A > 0 thus denotes cases where the binding energy has been predicted to be too low and conversely, A < 0 corresponds to a prediction of too much nuclear binding. Table 1 summarizes average and root-mean-square deviations for twelve models. 

In connection with other 1,2-dithiole derivatives the ESCA spectra of l,2-dithiole-3-thiones and 5-phenyl-l,2-dithiol-3-onehave been discussed.275 In the thiones it was found that thiocarbonyl sulfur had an average binding energy near that of dithiocarboxylate sulfur. This means that a positive charge is present in the ring, i.e., mesoionic forms such as 179 must contribute considerably to the structure. The same is true for the l,2-dithiol-3-one. 

Fig. 2.1 Variation in average binding energy per nucleon as a function of mass number. Note that the energy scale is positive, meaning that the nuclei with the highest values of the binding energies release the greatest amount of energy upon formation.

Fig. 16. A. Plot of log iNa as a function of T 1 (°K) using the experimental values of the rate constants and the location of the binding sites in Eq. 4. The Gibbs free energy of activation is calculated from Eq. 3 the AS are taken to be zero, and the current is calculated by means of Eq. 4. The purpose is to demonstrate that multibarrier channel transport can be seen as single rate process with average values for the enthalpies of activation. Non-linearity of such a plot is then taken to arise form the dynamic nature of the channel.

---