Matter atomic view

Turning to the atomic view of matter, we find more than a hundred different elements. Each of these elements has a kind of atom that is somehow different from all of the others. With these 100 elements, chemists have prepared about one... 

Atomic views of the three different phases of matter. 

Several workers undertook this task. The most notable of these was Perrin. Perrin s special success was due to his technique for preparing particles to suspend that were of uniform and known size. The uniformity was achieved by fractional centrifuging, and the size was established by noting that they could be coagulated into chains whose length could be measured and whose links could be counted. The microscopic observation of these uniform particles enabled Perrin and his students to verify the Einstein results and to make four independent measurements of Avogadro s number. See Fig. 1. These results not only established an understanding of Brownian movement, but also they silenced the last critics of the atomic view of matter. 

Statistical mechanics provides a bridge between the properties of atoms and molecules (microscopic view) and the thermodynmamic properties of bulk matter (macroscopic view). For example, the thermodynamic properties of ideal gases can be calculated from the atomic masses and vibrational frequencies, bond distances, and the like, of molecules. This is, in general, not possible for biochemical species in aqueous solution because these systems are very complicated from a molecular point of view. Nevertheless, statistical mechanmics does consider thermodynamic systems from a very broad point of view, that is, from the point of view of partition functions. A partition function contains all the thermodynamic information on a system. There is a different partition function... 

On the atomic conception of combination, constituents will only be combined relatively to perception and the same thing will be combined to one percipient, if his sight is not sharp while to the eye of Lynceus nothing will be combined (DG 1.10, 328a13f.), so that substances only appear mixed to us because we cannot distinguish the individual juxtaposed particles. If the ingredients were thus preserved, combination would not be an objective physical state of matter, which Aristotle thought there was no reason to accept. In fact, the atomic view has no real conception of... 

Philosophers from the earliest times speculated about the nature of the fundamental stuff from which the world is made. Democritus (460-370 Bc) and other early Greek philosophers described the material world as made up of tiny indivisible particles they called atomos, meaning indivisible or uncuttable. Later, however, Plato and Aristotle formulated the notion that there can be no ultimately indivisible particles, and the atomic view of matter faded for many centuries during which Aristotelean philosophy dominated Western culture. 

The modern atomic theory of matter is almost two centuries old. It was in the early nineteenth century that Dalton s work (John Dalton, England, 1766-1844) advanced the proposal that matter is not continuously divisible and that there is some fundamental type of particle, the atom. The line of thought that began with the atomic theory of matter took its next major step in the early twenheth century when experiments pointed to the existence of subatomic particles. In a few more decades, it became clear that there are even smaller particles. Even today, the search for exotic subatomic particles continues. As matter is viewed using more and more powerful techniques, we can see that all matter is composed of discrete building blocks (parhcles) rather than continuous materials. 

P should also minimize distinction.s between conventionally distinct but atomic. primitives (such as space, mass, time, etc.). The vision is to take one more step along the metaphoric road remove jnan from the center of the universe —> remove all privileged frames of reference —> remove all absolutes —> remove all distinction between space and matter—r remove all distinction ( ) Start by eliminating the tacit assumption that whatever physics is self-organizing itself out of the soup of the current crop of physicists is the physics of this universe in short, go from a solipsistic phys-ics to a fundamentally relativistic physics, wherein even physics itself becomes a set (an infinite hierarchical set ) of self-consistent world-views rather than a prescribed set of exactly/uniquely prescribed laws operating independently of all observers. 

---