Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Localized molecular orbitals central

It is interesting to compare the implications expressed by these subrules with the depiction of some localized molecular orbitals in Figure 3-41 [97], The lone pair of electrons occupies more space than do the bonding pairs in the vicinity of the central atom. Also, a bond to a more electronegative ligand such as fluorine occupies less space in... [Pg.146]

The following is a summary of the local group molecular orbitals from which one may select the primary building blocks for interaction diagrams. The orbitals are classified according to the coordination number of the central atom. The local symmetry properties and relative energies are independent of the atomic number of the central atom itself. [Pg.56]

Aromatic systems play a central role in organic chemistry, and a great deal of this has been fruitfully interpreted in terms of molecular orbital theory that is, in terms of electrons moving more-or-less independently of one another in delocalized orbitals. The spin-coupled model provides a clear and simple picture of the motion of correlated electrons in such systems. The spin-coupled and classical VB descriptions of benzene are very similar, except for the small but crucial distortions of the orbitals. The localized character of the orbitals allows the electrons to avoid one another. Nonetheless, the electrons are still able to influence one another directly because of the non-orthogonality of the orbitals. [Pg.54]

Crystal field, or d-d, transitions are defined as transitions from levels that are exclusively perturbed d orbitals to levels of the same type. In other words, the electron is originally localized at the central metal ion and remains so in the excited state. When the system has ( symmetry, Laporte s rule says that an electric-dipole allowed transition must be between a g state and an u state, i.e., u - g. Since all the crystal field electronic states are gerade ( g ), no electric-dipole allowed transitions are possible. In short, all d-d transitions are symmetry forbidden and hence have low intensities. The fact that the d-d transitions are observed at all is due to the interaction between the electronic motion and the molecular vibration. We will discuss this (vibronic) interaction later (Section 8.10). [Pg.271]

F 2p character than F 2s character and is also bonding with respect to the FI orbital. This set of orbitals (2cr, 3a) illustrates a central feature of the MO approach. Whereas a simple Lewis structure or valence picture would draw a localized electron pair interaction between two orbitals, the MO picture attributes some bonding character to two separate molecular orbitals. This simple MO diagram illustrates the difficulty of determining a meaningful definition for bond order in a polyatomic molecule. No single MO completely represents the bonding between two atoms. [Pg.2739]

We wish to compare the valence band density of states (DOS) of f.c.c. and h.c.p. metals with and without stacking faults. We therefore adopt a mixture of the f.c.c. and h.c.p. structures as a representative of the stacking fault structure of either of these structures. To calculate the DOS we summed up the squares of the coefficients of molecular orbital wave functions and convoluted the summed squares with the Gaussian of full width 0.5 eV at half maximum. For these DOS calculations we chose the metals Mg, Ti, Co, Cu and Zn. The model clusters employed here for both the f.c.c. and the h.c.p. structures were made of 13 atoms i.e., a central atom and 12 equidistant neighbor atoms. These structures are shown in Fig. 1. We reproduced the typical electronic structures in bulk materials by extracting the molecular orbitals localized only on the central atom from all the molecular orbitals which contributed - those localized on ligand atoms as well as on the central atom. To perform calculations we take the symmetry of the cluster as C3, and the number... [Pg.231]

From the perspective of Molecular Orbital Theory, the energy of the lowest unoccupied antibonding orbital (LUMO) has been estimated at 3.8 eV, indicates the high electron affinity with respect to the central carbon atom, hence it is susceptible to attack by nucleophile and to the reduction while that of highest occupied molecular orbital (HOMO) is susceptible to attack by electrophile due to its high localized electron density as oxygen inplane lone pairs. It also interacts weakly with Lewis and Bronsted acids [21, 22a]. [Pg.4]


See other pages where Localized molecular orbitals central is mentioned: [Pg.195]    [Pg.141]    [Pg.249]    [Pg.44]    [Pg.138]    [Pg.145]    [Pg.132]    [Pg.133]    [Pg.179]    [Pg.15]    [Pg.40]    [Pg.76]    [Pg.143]    [Pg.1035]    [Pg.229]    [Pg.50]    [Pg.785]    [Pg.267]    [Pg.25]    [Pg.1]    [Pg.96]    [Pg.104]    [Pg.350]    [Pg.152]    [Pg.785]    [Pg.179]    [Pg.6238]    [Pg.139]    [Pg.216]    [Pg.5]    [Pg.29]    [Pg.298]    [Pg.179]    [Pg.19]    [Pg.312]    [Pg.76]    [Pg.372]    [Pg.100]    [Pg.280]    [Pg.346]    [Pg.363]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.145 , Pg.153 , Pg.154 , Pg.163 , Pg.183 , Pg.184 , Pg.192 ]




SEARCH



Local orbitals

Localized Molecular Orbitals

Localized molecular orbital

Localized molecular orbitals localization

Localized orbitals

Molecular orbital localization

Orbital localization

Orbital localized

© 2024 chempedia.info