Jetting video imaging

Girault and Schiffrin [6] and Samec et al. [39] used the pendant drop video-image method to measure the surface tension of the ideally polarized water-1,2-dichloroethane interface in the presence of KCl [6] or LiCl [39] in water and tetrabutylammonium tetraphenylborate in 1,2-dichloroethane. Electrocapillary curves of a shape resembling that for the water-nitrobenzene interface were obtained, but a detailed analysis of the surface tension data was not undertaken. An independent measurement of the zero-charge potential difference by the streaming-jet electrode technique [40] in the same system provided the value identical with the potential of the electrocapillary maximum. On the basis of the standard potential difference of —0.225 V for the tetrabutylammonium ion transfer, the zero-charge potential difference was estimated as equal to 8 10 mV [41]. 

Figure 13.6 Jetting at the membrane surface (video imaging and flow simulation fluent) [10, 24—26].

Fig. 8 Video image sequence showing the water jet passing the interface between isooctane top) and an aqueous phase bottom). After reducing the flow rate from 150 to 75 ml/h the jet becomes inhomogeneous. When the flow is stopped, the jet decomposed into single vesicles containing small amounts of Isooctane in their membranes right-hand image)...

Figure 29 (Qin and Liu, 1982) shows the behavior of individual particles above the distributor recorded by video camera of small clusters of particles, coated with a fluorescent material and spot-illuminated by a pulse of ultra violet light from an optical fiber. The sequential images, of which Fig. 29 just represents exposures after stated time intervals, were reconstructed to form the track of motion of the particle cluster shown in Fig. 30. Neither this track nor visual observation of the shallow bed while fluidized, reveal any vestige of bubbles. Instead, the particles are thrown up by the high velocity jets issuing from the distributor orifices to several times their static bed height.

---