Manifolds, irreducible linear

Generalization of the characteristic value problem. The characteristic value problem can be formulated as the quest for the irreducible linear manifolds which are invariant under an operator. The principal result of the spectral theory of normal operators can be formulated, from this point of view, as the statement that all irreducible linear manifolds of normal operators are one-dimensional. Similarly, one can ask for irreducible closed linear manifolds which are invariant under a set of operators. Since a closed linear manifold which is invariant under a set of operators is also invariant under the group or algebra generated by these operators, one is naturally led in this way to a linear manifold which belongs to an irreducible representation of a group or an algebra. 

All CS manifolds in based on the one-particle group U 2s) are families of AGP states, some of these manifolds are irreducible Riemannian manifolds and correspond to cosets formed by the maximal compact subgroups U 2M) XU 2s - 2M) and USp(25), while others are reducible and correspond to non-maximal compact subgroups USp(2basic physical properties, e.g., U 2M) X U 2s - 2M) invariant manifold describes uncorrelated IPSs, the USp(2s) invariant manifold describes highly correlated extreme AGP states that are superconducting, while the USp(2a>i) X X USp(2wp) X SU(2) X SU(2 ) invariant manifold for general (Oj,..., cr, describe intermediate types of correlation and linear response properties, see, for a particular example. Ref. [35], most of which have not been explored in any depth. 

The operators in equation (3) act within the ground manifold possessing S = j and L = 1 (k is the orbital reduction factor, ge is the electronic g-factor). The axial (trigonal) component of the crystal field directed along the C3-axis is defined as a linear combination of the irreducible tensors of Oh that becomes scalar in the... 

An irreducible even-dimensional complex torus (see Example 1 below) may serve as an example of a manifold integrated additively, but not integrated in the weak sense. However, any symplectic form on a torus in some linear coordinates is written in the canonical form as... 

---