Inverse magnetic susceptibility temperature

Fig. II. (a) Temperature dependence of the magnetization for 200-nm thick Ga, MnrAs with x =0.053. The magnetic field is applied perpendicular to the sample surface (hard axis). The inset shows the temperature dependence of the remanent magnetization (0 T) and the magnetization at 1 T in a field parallel to the film surface, (b) Temperature dependence of the saturation magnetization determined from the data shown in (a) by using ArTott plots (closed circles). Open circles show inverse magnetic susceptibility and the Curie-Weiss fit is depicted by the solid straight line (Ohno and Matsukura 2001).

Fig. 20. Inverse magnetic susceptibility of TbRtt4Pi2 vs. temperature measured at H = 1 T. Inset shows an enlarged view of susceptibility data below 20 K (Sekine et al., 2000a).

Fig. 34. Inverse magnetic susceptibility vs. absolute temperature for several samples Ro jCao sMuOj compared with LaMnOj and LaojBaojMnC, alter Goodenough and Zhou (1998).

Figure 12. Inverse magnetic susceptibility (1/x) VS. temperature (T) at 0.1 Tesla of reduced and unaltered powders of ferruginous smectite (sample SWa-1 from the Source Clay Minerals Repository of The Clay Minerals Society). Insert reports Fe2 contents as X of total Fe. (Reproduced with permission from Ref. 33. Copyright 1987 The Clay Minerals Society).

FIGURE 28 Temperature dependence of the inverse magnetic susceptibility of solvent-free Sc< C82 crystal for slow and fast cooling. 

Figure 4. Inverse magnetic susceptibility Co) versus temperature for a series of catalysts with different Co/Mo ratios.

The magnetic properties of individual transition metal ions in compounds and complexes are considered in (5ee Magnetism of Transition Metal lon. There, the properties of a given ion are assumed to be independent of the presence of any other ions. However, the possibility of /TU/jor interactions between ions is taken into account in those cases in which the temperature dependence of the inverse magnetic susceptibility deviates from the Curie law. This was accomplished by inclusion of the Weiss constant and the generation of the Curie-Weiss law. The properties of extended arrays of this type may be primarily understood in terms of single ions, and they will not be discussed here. 

Fig. 12. Temperature dependence of the inverse magnetic susceptibility of YbPtSn. The right-hand inset shows the low-temperature magnetic susceptibility, while the magnetization behavior is presented in the upper inset. From Kaczorowski et al. (1999).

Fig. 11.4. Inverse magnetic susceptibility vs temperature for (La, Th)Ce alloys with La, Th matrix compositions of 10, 45, 65, 80, 90 and lOOat.% Th [after Huber et al. (1975)].

Fig. 11.15. Inverse magnetic susceptibility vs temperature for CeSn, (open triangles), Celn, (solid circles) and CePb, (open circles). Measurements were made in a magnetic field of 19kOe [after Tsuchida and Wallace (1965)].

Temperature dependence of inverse magnetic susceptibility for Fe(S2CNR2)3 (R = n-C H2n+i). (Reproduced from Ref. 4 with permission of Deutschen Chemischen Gesellschaft.)... 

Temperature dependences of (a) effective magnetic moment, (b) inverse magnetic susceptibility, and (c) magnetization curves ( FCM, a RM, ZFCM) for (n-C4H9)4N[Fe"Fe "(mto)3]. (Reproduced from Ref. 33 with permission of MDPI Publishing.)... 

Fig. 103. Inverse magnetic susceptibility vs. temperature of TmSeg jjTea for pressures of 0.93 and 1.71 GPa. In the inset the effective moment is shown vs. pressure. The arrow at 1.4 GPa indicates the SMT. (After Boppart and Wachter 1984c.)...

Fig. 52. Inverse magnetic susceptibility of UAs versus temperature as a function of crystal orientation, measured on field-cooled samples.

Fig. 79. Inverse magnetic susceptibility as a function of temperature for three metallic and inter-...

Fig. 80. Temperature dependence of the inverse magnetic susceptibilities, 1/x, for YbN, YbP, YbAs and YbSb between 1.5 and 300 K (Ott et al. 1982).

Fig. 10.5 Inverse magnetic susceptibility of BkF at 803 and 1205 G and BkOz at 1200 and 1603 G as a function of temperature. The solid lines are least-squares fits of the data to the Curie-IVeiss law [182], Reproduced with permission cf the authors and the American Physical Society.)...

Fig. 41. Inverse magnetic susceptibility 1/xmoi of PrSe and PrTe versus temperature.

Fig. 50. Inverse magnetic susceptibility 1/Xmoi of NdSe and NdTe versus temperature up to 1300 K. The dashed curves are calculated from Van Vleck s formula for different screening constants a. The inset shows the range from 4 to 150 K in an extended temperature scale.

Fig. 182. Inverse magnetic susceptibility 1/Xmoi for Tm Se with lattice constants from a = 5.6275 to 5.7119 A versus temperature [1]. Each curve is displaced upwards by 10 units from the one below.

Fig. 206. Inverse magnetic susceptibility 1/Xmoi versus temperature for solid solutions (Tm,Y)Se, and (Tm, La)Se compared with TmSe of different stoichiometry. Each curve is displaced upward from the one below by 20 units.

Fig. 213. Inverse magnetic susceptibility 1/Xmoi of Tmo.saEuo, 17 and Tmo.5Euo.5Se versus temperature.

Figure 20. Temperature dependent ZFC (open symbol) and FC (solid symbol) Magnetization behavior of ordered LaBaCofisS, (a) magnetic susceptibility, %, under H=0.01 Tesla (inset figure shows the inverse magnetic susceptibility, versus temperature plot and solid line is Curre-Weiss fitting) and (b) Magnetic moment in different magnetic fields (H=0.01, 0.1, 2 and 5 Tesla).

Fig. 16 The temperature dependence of the inverse molar magnetic susceptibility, a, and the corresponding effective magnetic moment, b, of [Fe(HC(3,5-(CH3)2pz)3)2](BF4)2. Data obtained from [46]...

CURIE-WEISS LAW. The transition from ferromagnetic to paramagnetic properties, which occurs in iron and other ferromagnetic substances at the Curie point, is accompanied by a change in the relationship of Ihe magnetic susceptibility lo the temperature. P. Curie stated in 1895 that above this point the susceptibility varies inversely as the absolute temperature. But this was found in be not generally true, and was modified in 1907 by P. Weiss to stare that the susceptibility uf a paramagnetic substance above the Curie point varies inversely as the excess of the temperature above that point. At or below the Curie point, the Curie-Weiss law does not hold. 

---