Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Invariant, small-angle scattering

Fig. 5.6 Small-angle scattering invariant (line), domain spacing (d, open circles) and PE lamellar thickness (/, filled circles) versus time during a series of quenches for a PE-PEE diblock (M = 20kgmol, /pE = 0.55) (Hamley etal. 1997a). The sample was successively quenched from 140°C to 104 C, 100°C, 98°C, 106°C. (Tm (PE) = 108°C for this sample.)... Fig. 5.6 Small-angle scattering invariant (line), domain spacing (d, open circles) and PE lamellar thickness (/, filled circles) versus time during a series of quenches for a PE-PEE diblock (M = 20kgmol, /pE = 0.55) (Hamley etal. 1997a). The sample was successively quenched from 140°C to 104 C, 100°C, 98°C, 106°C. (Tm (PE) = 108°C for this sample.)...
Fig. 11.11 Small angle scattering invariant of the samples 1PP4 with [rr] = 5.9 mol% (a, a ) and iPP5 with [rr] = 11.0 mol% (b, b ) normalized for the invariant of the unoiiented sample (e = 0) as a function of strain (R, 11.9). Curves a and b are corrected for the decrease in thickness t by assuming that t decreases according to the power law t = to loll)", with to the thickness of the undeformed specimen and i/ = 0.5 as expected for an ideal rubbery material. The correction has been applied for deformations >200%... Fig. 11.11 Small angle scattering invariant of the samples 1PP4 with [rr] = 5.9 mol% (a, a ) and iPP5 with [rr] = 11.0 mol% (b, b ) normalized for the invariant of the unoiiented sample (e = 0) as a function of strain (R, 11.9). Curves a and b are corrected for the decrease in thickness t by assuming that t decreases according to the power law t = to loll)", with to the thickness of the undeformed specimen and i/ = 0.5 as expected for an ideal rubbery material. The correction has been applied for deformations >200%...
Figure 2. Small-angle x-ray scattering invariant versus scattering angle for 1100 equivalent weight precursor and Its acid form showing the effect of hydration. Reproduced with permission from Ref. 25. Copyright 1981 John Wiley Sons, Inc. Figure 2. Small-angle x-ray scattering invariant versus scattering angle for 1100 equivalent weight precursor and Its acid form showing the effect of hydration. Reproduced with permission from Ref. 25. Copyright 1981 John Wiley Sons, Inc.

See other pages where Invariant, small-angle scattering is mentioned: [Pg.147]    [Pg.285]    [Pg.129]    [Pg.118]    [Pg.367]    [Pg.132]    [Pg.29]    [Pg.78]    [Pg.117]    [Pg.176]    [Pg.25]    [Pg.51]    [Pg.14]    [Pg.398]    [Pg.34]    [Pg.227]    [Pg.34]    [Pg.96]    [Pg.35]    [Pg.195]    [Pg.113]    [Pg.152]    [Pg.65]    [Pg.886]    [Pg.299]    [Pg.50]    [Pg.152]    [Pg.187]    [Pg.188]    [Pg.317]    [Pg.436]    [Pg.4]    [Pg.803]    [Pg.74]    [Pg.368]    [Pg.185]    [Pg.8146]    [Pg.574]    [Pg.134]   


SEARCH



Scattering invariants

Scattering small angle

Small-angle

© 2024 chempedia.info