Intergranular corrosion potentiostatic methods

Cihal and Prazak determined the resistance of 18/8 stainless steel to this type of corrosion. They claimed that the technique could be used on steels which are difficult to test by other methods, including steels of low carbon content, and steels in which stabilising elements are present. By means of potentiostatic curves and light etching at constant potential they confirmed that the extent of intergranular corrosion depended upon the amount of precipitated chromium carbide. 

Corradi and Gasperini claimed that the potentiostatic method was more effective and simpler than the Strauss test for determining intergranular corrosion of stainless steels, and suggested that the method may lend itself for use on finished equipment in service as a non-destructive test. 

---