Template interaction sites

Fig. 6-10. Influence of the number of basic interaction sites of the template versus the separation factor measured in chromatography for the corresponding racemate. The templates were imprinted using MAA as functional monomer by thermochemical initiation at 60/90/120 °C (24 h at each temperature) and using acetonitrile as porogen. (From Sellergren et al. [15].)...

Both of these MIP preparation procedures have their advantages and limitations [20, 21]. For instance, the size of the analyte molecule is not a discriminating criterion in covalent imprinting since the template selectively determines the interaction sites. In contrast, non-covalent imprinting has the advantage of being simpler since an additional synthetic step is not required to introduce the template into the polymer matrix. Moreover, removal of the template via extraction with the suitable solvent solution is simple and mostly complete for the non-covalent imprinting. 

Bulk rather than film imprinting can be adopted towards increasing the number of the recognition sites in MIP. In the former imprinting, the template molecules determine both the diffusion pathways and interaction sites. Application of a bulk... 

---