Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Indicator variables matrix

X indicates a matrix of independent variables that have been estimated by a model, where X indicates a matrix of independent variables that have been actually measured on an analytical device. [Pg.357]

Thus the coordinate transformations (1.18) apply also to the indicator variables and to the objective function. Dh the basis of this observation it is convenient to perform all calculations on a matrix extended by the Zj-cj values and the objective function value as its last row. This extended matrix is the so-called simplex tableau. [Pg.338]

Finally, the placement of a carrot symbol on top of a letter indicates that the letter represents an estimated quantity, rather than a measured or theoretical quantity. For example X indicates a matrix of independent variables that have been estimated by a model, where X indicates a matrix of independent variables that have been actually measured on an analytical device. [Pg.231]

The RPDs are high, indicating high matrix variability. Because these samples cannot be homogenized due to contaminant volatility, high RPD values are expected. [Pg.288]

The lead concentrations are substantially higher than the PQL and vary significantly, indicating high matrix variability even in homogenized split samples. [Pg.288]

Connoiiy surface area - molecular surface (O solvent-accessible molecular surface) constant interval reciprocal indices -> distance matrix constant and near-constant variables variable reduction constitutional descriptors... [Pg.90]

The Free-Wilson descriptors of the i th compound are indicator variables Ij s where I, = 1 if the kth substituent is present in the ith site and = 0 otherwise. These descriptors are usually collected in a table called the Free- Wlson matrix (Table F-1), where the rows represent the data set molecules and each column represents a substituent in a specific site. [Pg.182]

Fujita-Ban analysis is a modified Free-Wilson analysis where the activity contribution of each substituent is relative to the activity of a - reference compound [Fujita and Ban, 1971]. Any compound can be chosen as the reference, but usually the H-sub-stituted compoimd (all R = H) is adopted. The Free-Wilson matrix in the Fujita-Ban analysis does not contain the descriptors corresponding to the substituents of the reference compound, i.e. the number of indicator variables is diminished by the number of sites S with respect to the corresponding original Free-Wilson approach. Moreover the row vector corresponding to the reference compound is characterized by all the descriptor binary values equal to zero. [Pg.184]

Some connectivity-like indices are reported below. Other connectivity-like indices reported elsewhere are JJ indices derived from the Wiener matrix, electronegativity-based connectivity indices, extended edge connectivity indices, chiral connectivity indices, variable... [Pg.165]

To calculate Fourier coefficients, each row of the Free-Wilson matrix, denoted by FW(n, p), where n is the number of molecules and p the number of site/substituent indicator variables, is transformed into cosine and sine terms according to the following equation ... [Pg.322]

Variable connectivity index, variable Balaban index, and variable Zagreb indices for 2-pentanol. A(x, y) and D(x, y) are the variable augmented adjacency matrix and the variable augmented distance matrix, respectively. VS, indicates the matrix row sums x and y are the variable parameters for carbon and oxygen atom, respectively. [Pg.841]

If the substituents at a particular position of a molecule differ from each other in a qualitative way, for example if a particular group is esterified, then one may choose to include this in the matrix of properties, with an indicator variable set to 1.0 (if the property is present), or 0.0 (if it is not). For example,... [Pg.74]

The correlation matrix for the parameters employed in Table VI is shown in Table VII. From this it is evident that the indicator variable D3 which stands for the presence of Br in 3-position is indispensible. [Pg.221]

Indicator variables (I 1.0/0.0) are used to code the presence or absence of a key substructure. Regression of real numbers (pIC50 s) against a matrix of indicator variables is a valid procedure for large sets, as in the Free-Wllson method. However, many of the sets in this study are small (n = 7-10) and it is probable that statistical measures for these sets are only approximate. The overall consistency of substructure dependence in both small and larger sets is considered to validate these measures in a seml-quantltatlve sense. [Pg.282]

Figure 7.1 Transformation of the raw data (a) given by a fictitious subject into a similarity matrix (b), dissimilarity matrix (c), and a matrix of indicator variables (d). Figure 7.1 Transformation of the raw data (a) given by a fictitious subject into a similarity matrix (b), dissimilarity matrix (c), and a matrix of indicator variables (d).
The opinions written in the workshop conference report (Viswanathan 2007) represent a practical approach to assessing matrix effects with certain assumptions, i.e. using multiple individual lots of matrix spiked with known amounts of analyte will provide a good indication for matrix effects for the method in general, and stable isotope internal standards will provided significant compensation for matrix effects that will result in lower variability of response and better method reproducibility. A further discussion of how to assess and minimize matrix effects as part of the development process can be found in Chapter 9, and the guidelines discussed above can be incorporated into... [Pg.562]

As indicated earlier, the vaUdity of the method of dimensional analysis is based on the premise that any equation that correcdy describes a physical phenomenon must be dimensionally homogeneous. An equation is said to be dimensionally homogeneous if each term has the same exponents of dimensions. Such an equation is of course independent of the systems of units employed provided the units are compatible with the dimensional system of the equation. It is convenient to represent the exponents of dimensions of a variable by a column vector called dimensional vector represented by the column corresponding to the variable in the dimensional matrix. In equation 3, the dimensional vector of force F is [1,1, —2] where the prime denotes the matrix transpose. [Pg.105]


See other pages where Indicator variables matrix is mentioned: [Pg.197]    [Pg.332]    [Pg.469]    [Pg.483]    [Pg.348]    [Pg.1257]    [Pg.48]    [Pg.340]    [Pg.143]    [Pg.160]    [Pg.161]    [Pg.166]    [Pg.409]    [Pg.160]    [Pg.161]    [Pg.166]    [Pg.279]    [Pg.499]    [Pg.39]    [Pg.44]    [Pg.357]    [Pg.591]    [Pg.289]    [Pg.564]    [Pg.95]    [Pg.271]    [Pg.286]    [Pg.293]    [Pg.295]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.160 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.160 ]




SEARCH



Indicator variable

Matrix variability

© 2024 chempedia.info