Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Incoherent spontaneous emission

The ultimate linewidth of a laser oscillator is limited by the "contamination" of the coherent stimulated emission by Incoherent spontaneous emission. The resulting limiting linewidth was given by Schawlow and Townes as ... [Pg.143]

Figure 9.20 Light emission (a) normal spontaneous emission produces incoherent light, and (h) stimulated emission produces coherent fight. Figure 9.20 Light emission (a) normal spontaneous emission produces incoherent light, and (h) stimulated emission produces coherent fight.
Light is emitted from the bulk material at random times and in all directions, such that the photons emitted are out of phase with each other in both time and space. Light produced by spontaneous emission is therefore called incoherent light. [Pg.6]

Here p is the density matrix for all molecular states in the three-level system depicted in Fig. 4, and all incoherent relaxation terms caused, for example, by collisions, spontaneous emission, or decay in a (quasi)continuum are incorporated in the relaxation matrix rreiax. [Pg.423]

Spontaneous Emission—This occurs when there ate too many electrons in the conduction band of a semiconductor. These electrons drop spontaneously into vacant locations m the valence band, a photon being emitted foi each election, The emitted light is incoherent. [Pg.1163]

In fluorescence studies, spontaneous emission almost always dominates, hence radiation coming from the different fluorophores of a sample is incoherent. [Pg.245]

We may say that for the unobserved system the emission is a cooperative effect of the N parts, whereas for the observed system we have an ordinary spontaneous emission from the N pieces. More to this, for the unobserved case the N emitters are stimulated by the same vacuum, imparting phase correlations between them. On the observed system the pieces are influenced by different and statistically independent vacuum fields leading to mutually incoherent emissions. [Pg.548]

If such a wavepacket were formed in H, then the wavepacket would remain intact, with a fixed orientation in space, until some incoherent process (either spontaneous emission (see chapter 4) or collisions, discussed above) destroys the coherence. This arises because conservation of angular momentum for the excited electron applies strictly in this case. However, the experiment is performed in an alkali atom, which possesses a core, and there is a back reaction of the excited electron on this core (core polarisation), which depends on the degree of penetration of the excited electron into the core, i.e. on the quantum defect, which itself is a function of the angular momentum. Thus, the wavepacket precesses under the influence of a small potential due to the quantum defect of the alkali. It is found to follow a classical trajectory determined by the core polarisation potential. [Pg.54]

The coherent emission intensity of an ensemble of N molecules is therefore N times stronger than the incoherent emission. This result is due to the N(N— 1) cross-terms in the expansion as first shown by Dicke. A closer look at this enhanced spontaneous emission shows that the coherent emission is also highly directional, in fact in a sample of macroscopic size the constructive interference effects only occur in the direction of the exciting laser beam. [Pg.425]

Spontaneous emission occurs in incandescence. The light photons all have the same frequency but the waves possess random phases and the light is incoherent. Stimulated emission occurs in lasers. The photons produced have the same energy and frequency as the one that caused the emission, and the light waves of aU photons are coherent. [Pg.436]

Fig. 12. Ratio R3 of coherent/incoherent emission measured for AX = 0.7 A and a solid angle of 0.2 mrad. Experimental points are compared with theoretical curve a. Data in b and c are of f3, the modulation rate of spontaneous emission measured respectively with and without the laser. Abscissa is stored current. E = 166 MeV X] = 1.06 nm, X3 = 0.355 nm. Fig. 12. Ratio R3 of coherent/incoherent emission measured for AX = 0.7 A and a solid angle of 0.2 mrad. Experimental points are compared with theoretical curve a. Data in b and c are of f3, the modulation rate of spontaneous emission measured respectively with and without the laser. Abscissa is stored current. E = 166 MeV X] = 1.06 nm, X3 = 0.355 nm.
Although quite successful as a spectroscopic tool [40-48] (see Chapter 5 by W. Stwalley, P. Gould, and E. Eyler), as a preparatory tool, two-step PA suffers from losses due to spontaneous emission. Even in the presence of the stimulated emission process induced by a dump pulse [39], sponaneous emission populates in an incoherent fashion a large number of vibrational and rotational levels of the ground electronic state (or the low metastable electronic state), resulting in a translationally cold but internally hot ensemble of molecules. [Pg.293]

It can be easily deduced from the above that entanglement between two modes [F((d)<2] and squeezing in the respective modes are based on the eombined effeet of the correlated spontaneous emission (((8v) ) =1) and the sum mode intensity noise reduetion [5 ((o)<0]. Two faetors are responsible for entanglement and squeezing. The first is the eorrelated spontaneous emission. Only the sum mode B is coupled to the medium while the relative mode B is deeoupled fiem the system. The second is the dynamical noise reduction. For yi <<72 the population in state - ) is negligible. Then the four-level system in Fig. 11 is reduced to a three-level system ( 0 ), and 13 )). In the reduced system, the succession of < 3) the two-step incoherent process and the... [Pg.87]

Nuclear excitation and nuclear resonant scattering with synchrotron radiation have opened new fields in Mossbauer spectroscopy and have quite different aspects with the spectroscopy using a radioactive source. For example, as shown in Fig. 1.10, when the high brilliant radiation pulse passed through the resonant material and excite collectively the assemblies of the resonance nuclei in time shorter than the lifetime of the nuclear excited state, the nuclear excitons are formed and their coherent radiation decay occurs within much shorter period compared with an usual spontaneous emission with natural lifetime. This is called as speed-up of the nuclear de-excitation. The other de-excitations of the nuclei through the incoherent channels like electron emission by internal conversion process are suppressed. Synchrotron radiation is linearly polarized and the excitation and the de-excitation of the nuclear levels obey to the selection rule of magnetic dipole (Ml) transition for the Fe resonance. As shown in Fig. 1.10, the coherent de-excitation of nuclear levels creates a quantum beat Q given by... [Pg.18]

The book begins with a discussion of the fundamental definitions and concepts of classical spectroscopy, such as thermal radiation, induced and spontaneous emission, radiation power and intensity, transition probabilities and oscillator strengths, linear and nonlinear absorption and dispersion, and coherent and incoherent radiation fields. In order to understand the theoretical limitations of spectral resolution in classical spectroscopy, the next chapter treats the different causes of the broadening of spectral lines. Numerical examples at the end of each section illustrate the order of magnitude of the different effects. [Pg.2]


See other pages where Incoherent spontaneous emission is mentioned: [Pg.218]    [Pg.516]    [Pg.218]    [Pg.218]    [Pg.516]    [Pg.218]    [Pg.278]    [Pg.355]    [Pg.211]    [Pg.428]    [Pg.52]    [Pg.31]    [Pg.248]    [Pg.411]    [Pg.178]    [Pg.278]    [Pg.428]    [Pg.169]    [Pg.263]    [Pg.138]    [Pg.115]    [Pg.512]    [Pg.67]    [Pg.621]    [Pg.69]    [Pg.319]    [Pg.214]    [Pg.11]    [Pg.24]    [Pg.45]    [Pg.599]    [Pg.162]    [Pg.24]    [Pg.856]   


SEARCH



Incoherence

Incoherent emission

Incoherent)

Spontaneous emission

© 2024 chempedia.info