Hold-up, Pressure Drop, and Flooding Limits

Magnetic resonance imaging permitted direct observation of the liquid hold-up in monolith channels in a noninvasive manner. As shown in Fig. 8.14, the film thickness - and therefore the wetting of the channel wall and the liquid hold-up -increase nonlinearly with the flow rate. This is in agreement with a hydrodynamic model, based on the Navier-Stokes equations for laminar flow and full-slip assumption at the gas-liquid interface. Even at superficial velocities of 4 cm s-1, the liquid occupies not more than 15 % of the free channel cross-sectional area. This relates to about 10 % of the total reactor volume. Van Baten, Ellenberger and Krishna [21] measured the liquid hold-up of katapak-S . Due to the capillary forces, the liquid almost completely fills the volume between the catalyst particles in the tea bags (about 20 % of the total reactor volume) even at liquid flow rates of 0.2 cm s-1 (Fig. 8.15). The formation of films and rivulets in the open channels of the structure cause the further slight increase of the hold-up. 

Experiments to measure pressure drop and flooding limits were performed in a set-up accommodating monoliths with diameters of 43 mm (Fig. 8.16), while the length of the monoliths varied up to total length of 1 meter. The liquid was distributed by a nozzle the gas was introduced in countercurrent mode via mass flow controllers in the system. At the outlet of the monolith, a special device was mounted (Fig. 8.17), which improved draining of the monolith. The pressure drop along the column was measured using differential pressure transmitters. All experiments were performed at room temperature and atmospheric pressure. 

Typically, the pressure drop increases for a given liquid velocity slowly with increasing gas flow rates. Between 100 and 300 Pa nr1, the pressure drop 

---