Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Graft, preparation

Fig. 14. Hyperbranched polymer grafts prepared on a mercaptoundecanoic acid (MUA) self assembled monolayer confined to a gold substrate. PAAM-c-PAA represents a random copolymer of poly(acrylamide) and poly(acrylic acid) prepared from the poly(acrylic acid) carboxylic acid groups and an amine [129]... Fig. 14. Hyperbranched polymer grafts prepared on a mercaptoundecanoic acid (MUA) self assembled monolayer confined to a gold substrate. PAAM-c-PAA represents a random copolymer of poly(acrylamide) and poly(acrylic acid) prepared from the poly(acrylic acid) carboxylic acid groups and an amine [129]...
The history of the anchoring/grafting preparation may be found in Chapter 1 and Appendix 2 of Ref. 11. It appears that the first works have been performed to heterogenize transition metal complexes used as homogeneous catalysts of polymerization. [Pg.170]

Metal carbonyls may be used as precursors for anchoring/grafting preparation but their reactivity is much more intricate, and it is uncertain which type of bonding will be predominent and therefore whether anchoring will occur. [Pg.177]

Locke CE, Paul DR. Graft copolymer modification of polyethylene—polystyrene blends. I. Graft preparation and characterization. J Appl Polym Sci 1973 17 2597-2617. [Pg.432]

Fristrup CJ, Jankova K, Eskimergen R, Bukrinsky JT, Hvilsted S. Protein repellent hydrophilic grafts prepared by surface-initiated atom transfer radical polymerization from polypropylene. Polym Chem 2012 3(1) 198—203. [Pg.78]

Fig. 24.3 Graft preparation for double-bundle ACL reconstruction. The doubled semitendinosus tendons were prepared with suspensory buttons... Fig. 24.3 Graft preparation for double-bundle ACL reconstruction. The doubled semitendinosus tendons were prepared with suspensory buttons...
Figure 8.15 In vitro drug release profiles of grafts prepared using three distinct blending methods with fibers RM2 (20%), RMS (20%), or RMp (20%) over 77 days period. Each data point represents mean SD of three samples. Figure 8.15 In vitro drug release profiles of grafts prepared using three distinct blending methods with fibers RM2 (20%), RMS (20%), or RMp (20%) over 77 days period. Each data point represents mean SD of three samples.
Tijunelyte I, Babinot J, Guerrouache M, Valincius G, Carbonnier B (2012) Hydrophilic monolith with ethylene glycol-based grafts prepared via surface confined thiol-ene click photoaddition. Polymer 53 29-36... [Pg.187]


See other pages where Graft, preparation is mentioned: [Pg.484]    [Pg.25]    [Pg.47]    [Pg.284]    [Pg.341]    [Pg.506]    [Pg.311]    [Pg.311]    [Pg.319]    [Pg.194]    [Pg.319]    [Pg.328]    [Pg.463]    [Pg.514]    [Pg.234]    [Pg.305]    [Pg.744]    [Pg.1340]    [Pg.234]    [Pg.51]    [Pg.54]    [Pg.54]    [Pg.233]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.1455 ]




SEARCH



© 2024 chempedia.info