Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Experimental cross-over

Vfjp is the friction velocity and =/pVV2 is the wall stress. The friction velocity is of the order of the root mean square velocity fluctuation perpendicular to the wall in the turbulent core. The dimensionless distance from the wall is y+ = yu p/. . The universal velocity profile is vahd in the wall region for any cross-sectional channel shape. For incompressible flow in constant diameter circular pipes, = AP/4L where AP is the pressure drop in length L. In circular pipes, Eq. (6-44) gives a surprisingly good fit to experimental results over the entire cross section of the pipe, even though it is based on assumptions which are vahd only near the pipe wall. [Pg.637]

The experimental studies of a large number of low-temperature solid-phase reactions undertaken by many groups in 70s and 80s have confirmed the two basic consequences of the Goldanskii model, the existence of the low-temperature limit and the cross-over temperature. The aforementioned difference between quantum-chemical and classical reactions has also been established, namely, the values of k turned out to vary over many orders of magnitude even for reactions with similar values of Vq and hence with similar Arrhenius dependence. For illustration, fig. 1 presents a number of typical experimental examples of k T) dependence. [Pg.5]

However, for these parameters of the barrier, the cross-over temperature would exceed 500 K, while the observed values are 50 K. If one were to start from the d values calculated from the experimental data, the barrier height would go up to 30-40 kcal/mol, making any reaction impossible. This disparity between Vq and d is illustrated in fig. 34 which shows the PES cuts for the transition via the saddle-point and for the values of d indicated in table 2. [Pg.95]

Poelma and Tukker [130] developed the chronically isolated intestinal loop method which allows absorption to be studied in the absence of surgical trauma and anaesthesia. The model also facilitates cross-over experimental schemes. A major segment of the intestine is identified and surgically isolated under initial anaesthesia. The loop remains in the peritoneal cavity, with intact blood supply... [Pg.55]

Apart from mechanistic aspects, we have also summarized the macroscopic transport behavior of some well-studied materials in a way that may contribute to a clearer view on the relevant transport coefficients and driving forces that govern the behavior of such electrolytes under fuel cell operating conditions (Section 4). This also comprises precise definitions of the different transport coefficients and the experimental techniques implemented in their determination providing a physicochemical rational behind vague terms such as cross over , which are frequently used by engineers in the fuel cell community. Again, most of the data presented in this section is for the prototypical materials however, trends for other types of materials are also presented. [Pg.400]

The reactions on Rh/Ir usually proceed via oxidative addition to give hydrido (alkynyl) complexes, which then undergo 1,3-H shifts to form the vinylidene complexes. In general, a unimolecular mechanism has been considered to be operative. Recent studies of RhCl(PPr 2R)2 (R = C=NCBu =CHNMe) complexes have shown a remarkable acceleration of the isomerization, with the =C=CHBu complex being formed within seconds [32]. Suitable cross-over experiments showed that a bimolecular mechanism, earlier suggested by some experimental and computational results [33], did not operate. [Pg.3]

Equation (9) generalizes earlier porosity-Peclet number power-law correlations (Konstandopoulos et al., 2002) obtained at Pe > 0.3 down to the diffusion limited deposition limit. PeQ is a characteristic cross-over Peclet number defining the scale beyond which the convective mechanism will take over the diffusive mechanism of deposition and eK the large Peclet number asymptote of the porosity. K has a dependence on the aggregate size and it is described in a forthcoming publication (Konstandopoulos, 2007). Using Eq. (9) the experimental data of Fig. 9 can be collapsed on a single curve as shown in Fig. 10. [Pg.226]

As regards the dynamics of the fluid composition, the experimental results are very difficult to understand [66,67]. We expect that, if the pore size b is very large, the diffusion constant should first behave as in bulk near-critical fluids, but it will cross over to a value of order kBTZb/Gntis 2, being the correlation length (see Eq. (6.67) below). It would also be interesting to find whether the time correlation function of c would be influenced by structural relaxation of network (see Sect 6.2). [Pg.93]

Equation (D.37) was derived on the assumption that for short chain sections, up to a certain cross-over length nc, no excluded volume effect can exist at all beyond nc a maximum excluded volume characterized by the exponent v = 0.6 is assumed to be effective. To include experimentally observed lower exponents resulting from lower excluded volumes, the authors were forced to take nc as an adjustable parameter, i.e. nc was assumed to increase in length as the excluded volume is lowered under 6-conditions n< tends to infinity. Equation (D.37) must therefore be considered as a semiempirical relationship only. More exact calculations have been carried out by Stockmayer and Tanaka203 for small excluded volumes on the basis of a perturbation theory. [Pg.91]

The classical theory makes especially clear the inherent ambiguity of data analysis with the optical model, and this ambiguity carries over into the quantum model. If we wish to use experimental differential cross sections to gain information about V0(r) and P(b) or T(r), we must assume a reasonable parametric form for V0(r) that determines the shape of the cross section in the absence of reaction. The value P(b) is then determined [or T(r) chosen] by what is essentially an extrapolation of this parametric form. In the classical picture a V0(r) with a less steep repulsive wall yields a lower reaction probability from the same experimental cross-section data. The pair of functions V0 r), P b) or VQ(r), T(r) is thus underdetermined. The ambiguity may be relieved somewhat (to what extent is not yet known) by fitting several sets of data at different collision energies and, especially, by fitting other types of data such as total elastic and/or reactive cross sections simultaneously. [Pg.502]


See other pages where Experimental cross-over is mentioned: [Pg.128]    [Pg.642]    [Pg.34]    [Pg.133]    [Pg.98]    [Pg.7]    [Pg.177]    [Pg.100]    [Pg.120]    [Pg.153]    [Pg.754]    [Pg.14]    [Pg.307]    [Pg.68]    [Pg.203]    [Pg.52]    [Pg.58]    [Pg.516]    [Pg.392]    [Pg.245]    [Pg.172]    [Pg.77]    [Pg.16]    [Pg.333]    [Pg.340]    [Pg.548]    [Pg.271]    [Pg.281]    [Pg.181]    [Pg.251]    [Pg.101]    [Pg.68]    [Pg.129]    [Pg.105]    [Pg.11]    [Pg.112]    [Pg.65]    [Pg.33]    [Pg.222]    [Pg.31]    [Pg.36]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.251 ]




SEARCH



Cross over

Crossing-over

© 2024 chempedia.info